@Toffee_LoafWould you have allowed Hitler to just kick on also?
@Toffee_LoafWould you have allowed Hitler to just kick on also?
Well we did for a short while and one world war and a genocide later...Would you have allowed Hitler to just kick on also?
He won’t answer cos it rubbishes his whole conspiracy crapHe'll reply once he's completed his press release stating he's liberated GOT.
We drew the lines, Hitler crossed them, we stepped upWell we did for a short while and one world war and a genocide later...
We let Germany get away with the Anschluss. Our "line" was invade Poland over a year later.We drew the lines, Hitler crossed them, we stepped up
The US is taking us to the brink of a nuclear war, for what? Humanitarian reasons? For Ukraine cities? Do you really believe that? Can you be that naive? The US doesn't care about Ukraine or it's people.
Look at the most recent example. Do you remember Obama's Red Lines for Assad in Syria if he used chemical weapons on his own people? Assad used them half a dozen times and the US did nothing. Assad laughed in Obama's face. We've seen bluffs like this from the US for years (except when Trump was there ironically). The withdrawal after the Gulf war leaving the Kurds to their doom, some Allies we are! All we have from Biden are foreign policy catastrophes like Afghanistan where billions of dollars worth of equipment were left behind, so chaotic was the withdrawal, which the Taliban could use to round up, harass, rape and murder all the women left behind. Do you not remember people clinging to planes taking off and dropping people to their death from a 1000 ft in the air so scared where they? The US is really humanitarian... They won't do anything if Putin nukes because when Putin decides to escalate this, he's had enough and he has enough nukes to pound NATO 100 times over. All they'll do is rattle their sabres.
I don't understand how someone so intelligent can not only be fooled by media lies. Let's put it like this. Would you bet the lives of your children on the government's propaganda in Ukraine? Because that's what's at stake! It's crazy. Blowing up Nord Stream pipelines, blowing up bridges into Crimea, giving arms directly to an enemy. This isn't humanitarian. We're asking for it now! I've been waiting for some sensible, experienced person in public to say - what on Earth are we doing? Yet still we hear crickets. It's like Covid all over again - everybody nodding along meanwhile the economy goes to hell and people die in misery alone.
Awesome Python. A right nutter aren’t you toffee loaf.@Toffee_Loaf You will forgive me if I don't take seriously anything you have to say regarding the situation in Ukraine or elsewhere. Of all the virtues one could instill in a growing child, adolescent proactive murderous vigilantism is a new one to me.
View attachment 211242
![]()
We had to have a line though. Should it have been earlier, like we have with vlad, probably.We let Germany get away with the Anschluss. Our "line" was invade Poland over a year later.
It's probably very similar to our line now.
That's spot on er except for the murderous vigilantism bit. Jury considers charge and evidence and says: Innocent. I do find it strange that you didn't want to quibble on the thread in question about any of it though. There's no contradiction in my arguments.@Toffee_Loaf You will forgive me if I don't take seriously anything you have to say regarding the situation in Ukraine or elsewhere. Of all the virtues one could instill in a growing child, adolescent proactive murderous vigilantism is a new one to me.
View attachment 211242
![]()
There's no contradiction in my arguments.
Self defense is defined in law (UK and US). Rittenhouse followed it to the letter when thugs (one of whom was a convicted paedophile) that had been torching an entire city for successive days assaulted Rittenhouse and then attempted to murder him with a firearm. I fully support self-defense. Why don't you?
Pathetic post, even by your standardsThat's spot on er except for the murderous vigilantism bit. Jury considers charge and evidence and says: Innocent. I do find it strange that you didn't want to quibble on the thread in question about any of it though. There's no contradiction in my arguments.
Self defense is defined in law (UK and US). Rittenhouse followed it to the letter when thugs (one of whom was a convicted paedophile) that had been torching an entire city for successive days assaulted Rittenhouse and then attempted to murder him with a firearm. I fully support self-defense. Why don't you?
That's spot on er except for the murderous vigilantism bit. Jury considers charge and evidence and says: Innocent. I do find it strange that you didn't want to quibble on the thread in question about any of it though. There's no contradiction in my arguments.
Self defense is defined in law (UK and US). Rittenhouse followed it to the letter when thugs (one of whom was a convicted paedophile) that had been torching an entire city for successive days assaulted Rittenhouse and then attempted to murder him with a firearm. I fully support self-defense. Why don't you?

Wow.That's spot on er except for the murderous vigilantism bit. Jury considers charge and evidence and says: Innocent. I do find it strange that you didn't want to quibble on the thread in question about any of it though. There's no contradiction in my arguments.
Self defense is defined in law (UK and US). Rittenhouse followed it to the letter when thugs (one of whom was a convicted paedophile) that had been torching an entire city for successive days assaulted Rittenhouse and then attempted to murder him with a firearm. I fully support self-defense. Why don't you?
Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.