The 2 years since Martinez left.

Status
Not open for further replies.
This pure and simple.
If he had Moshiri's millions, would he have been punting on the likes of Niasse etc. Of course not.

Look at Klopp. Can't organise a defence so goes out and buys the best CB available. Shock horror all of a sudden Liverpool look far better.

Martinez would have done the same and should have been given the opportunity.

Unfortunately we binned him and all his work for "Hollywood" Koeman who made us run more. Worked a treat.


Case closed
 
Actually, Moyes had AJ running hell for leather to the corner flag as our 'out ball' instead of attacking the opposition goal.Never has there been a more obvious misuse of a strikers natural talent.
That's very true. Still cones under the category of "Moyes not great with big money" though.
 
Martinez developed Stones (47.5mil) and Lukaku (75mil--90mil) which was spent by Koeman on; Schneiderlin, Bolasie, Williams, Klaassen, Keane, Pickford, Sigurdsson.

Let that sink in for a while.


Martinez signed Lukaku for 27mil including the loan fee + McCarthy for 13mil + Niasse for 13mil.

McCarthy was wanted by Arsenal for 20mil+ and got an extension. It's absolutely obvious that the sales of his players %wise are far more profitable than what will be seen from the Koeman signings.

Have a think about that for a while.

These are as close to facts as you can get as opposed to your bizarre opinions and hatred for a manager.

I can only assume you've not been supporting the team for very long.
Correct mate. Martinez developed and/or bought talent that brought in about £150M quid on just two of them...which was promptly thrown down the toilet by that Dutch disaster.
 
I totally disagree with this...you only need to look at the facts;

Season 1 Martinez spent about 20mil and brought in 40mil approx.
Season 1 Koeman spent about 77mil and brought in 55mil

Season 2 Martinez spent about 35mil and brought in 2mil
Season 2 Koeman spent about 155mil and brought in 90mil

In comparable terms Koeman had a positive swing of 42mil year one and 33mil year 2.

Also Koeman was able to sell Stones and Lukaku (who Martinez had developed) benefitting from Lukaku's goals as well.

Clearly if Martinez had failed so badly then the improvements in those two players wouldn't have net us an approx 90mil profit enabling Koeman to waste it on total overpriced dross (bar Pickford).

Also, in his first 2 seasons Martinez signed 10 players and Koeman has signed closer to 20...theoretically gutting the squad and signing his own players who 'should' have fit his strategy and playing style...

The only comparatively large signing was Lukaku under Martinez...


I personally believe that if after Martinez finished 5th he was given similar backing in the transfer market he would have achieved success.

These are all stats about who spent what mean very little Zat.

As I said earlier, he took over a side that was a consistent top 6 finisher and left them in a worse position when he was potted. He took us backwards.

That is the major overriding factor and one that cannot be ignored.
 
Martinez developed Stones (47.5mil) and Lukaku (75mil--90mil) which was spent by Koeman on; Schneiderlin, Bolasie, Williams, Klaassen, Keane, Pickford, Sigurdsson.

Let that sink in for a while.


Martinez signed Lukaku for 27mil including the loan fee + McCarthy for 13mil + Niasse for 13mil.

McCarthy was wanted by Arsenal for 20mil+ and got an extension. It's absolutely obvious that the sales of his players in wise are far more profitable than what will be seen from the Koeman signings.

Have a think about that for a while.

These are as close to facts as you can get as opposed to your bizarre opinions and hatred for a manager.

I can only assume you've not been supporting the team for very long.

You are missing the point. While I agree the signings under Koeman are not value for money there are two points you are unaware of.
1. Koeman worked with Walsh so to blame everyone on him is unjust.
2. There is a massive inflation in the transfer market in the last couple of years so £13m spent in 2013 for McCarthy probably worths more than double in 2017.

Stones was a Moyes signing.

Lukaku no question about him he's a great signing.

McCarthy, Niasse and Funes Mori I am not sure about them hopefully we can recoup most money back (unlikely).

Oh and good, resorting to question the duration of my supporting the team is the best you can do. I probably support Everton longer than you.

I dislike Martinez because he was full of crap and he took the team backwards, simple.
 
Last edited:
Three seasons here:
  • 5th place finish - highest points total we've seen since HKI (and are likely to see for another decade), 21 wins from 38 games; football played on the deck the Everton Way
  • Two mid-table finishes
  • Two cup SFs; Rd of 16 in the EL
That now looks like a golden age....but "we were dreadful under Roberto"....the cup winner guiding one of the WC favourites.

No wonder so many fell for that Dutch divvy Koeman who killed the club, and still give credibility to the bellend who hired him.

You really are deluded when it comes to Martinez, especially when hearing your views on David Moyes who progressed the club in a way Roberto Martinez could only dream of. By the end of Moyes' tenure it did feel like him moving on was right for all involved. In hindsight though, the day Moyes left was the day our decline started and instead of stability we've now had 3 car crash seasons in 5. Unless Moshiri can utilise his finances appropriately to turn the current mess around, then we will end up as just another (Premier League version of) West Ham or Newcastle where midtable finishes are acceptable, or potentially slip back to 1990's Everton where the relegation threat is always there.

Moyes took the club from bottom half strugglers often looking over our shoulder at relegation to a consistent top 7 side with numerous finishes above the so called untouchable elite group of clubs now in the top 6 like Spurs and Liverpool. Martinez had one excellent season before turning us in to a bottom half shambles of a side two years running. We are now so far behind those top 6 it is embarrassing.

As I was going back earlier through the Fulham 2-2 Everton game back in 2012 for stuff on Fellaini seeing an infuriating draw where we inevitably did that typical Everton thing where we threw away a great chance to push on, I couldn't help but notice this:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/20107627

'Despite climbing to fourth in the table after stretching their unbeaten league run to seven games, this was definitely a case of two points dropped for Everton, who dominated from start to finish.'

Oh how I wish a frustrating draw left us in 4th position these days and hear an opposition manager say:

"Everton dominated us, all we could do was try to be positive. They are a very good footballing team. They are a settled team and know exactly what to do. Normally we are a good team, but I couldn't see that today."

We finished 6th that season, finishing above the RS where it was probably considered an underachieving season. Yet under that fraud Martinez we'd suffer a frustrating result like the above and end up in 13th at the end of it with no hope for the rest of the season. I know which I preferred.
 
These are all stats about who spent what mean very little Zat.

As I said earlier, he took over a side that was a consistent top 6 finisher and left them in a worse position when he was potted. He took us backwards.

That is the major overriding factor and one that cannot be ignored.

How much they spent + how many players they bought + who has improved the players...

Martinez took over an ageing punching above its weight side and added a couple of relative big money signings a season.
Koeman bought in almost an entire team for huge money and had the benefit of stones money and a developed lukaku


You are missing the point. While I agree the signings under Koeman are not value for money there are two points you do not aware.
1. Koeman worked with Walsh so to blame everyone on him is unjust.
2. There are a massive inflation in the transfer market in the last couple of years so £13m spent in 2013 for McCarthy probably worths more than double in 2017.


Stones was a Moyes signing.

Lukaku no question about him he's a great signing.

McCarthy, Niasse and Funes Mori I am not sure about them hopefully we can recoup most money back.

Oh and good, resorting to question the duration of my supporting the team is the best you can do. I probably support Everton longer than you.

I dislike Martinez because he was full of crap and he took the team backwards, simple.

two points you do not aware -- lol

Koeman worked with Walsh so to blame everyone on him is unjust -- Lookman/Pickford/Gana signed by Walsh and the rest by Koeman....Williams, Cuco, Bolasie, Schneiderlin etc lol

There are a massive inflation in the transfer market in the last couple of years so £13m spent in 2013 for McCarthy probably worths more than double in 2017. -- McCarthy signed for 13mil and Arsenal wanted him for 20mil+ lukaku signed for 27mil and sold for 75mil+ lol

Stones was a Moyes signing -- Developed by Martinez. lol again


Oh and good, resorting to question the duration of my supporting the team is the best you can do. I probably support Everton longer than you. -- Its a statement, if you keep slating Martinez off but have been championing Koeman, Bolasie, Cuco and others then its totally bizarre. Any fan who watched Mike Walker and Walter Smith sides for example would laugh at your comparisons.

I dislike Martinez because he was full of crap and he took the team backwards, simple. -- Fabulous, can you add in a list here of every Everton manager in your supporting history who you've not thought was 'full of crap'....


 
You really are deluded when it comes to Martinez, especially when hearing your views on David Moyes who progressed the club in a way Roberto Martinez could only dream of. By the end of Moyes' tenure it did feel like him moving on was right for all involved. In hindsight though, the day Moyes left was the day our decline started and instead of stability we've now had 3 car crash seasons in 5. Unless Moshiri can utilise his finances appropriately to turn the current mess around, then we will end up as just another (Premier League version of) West Ham or Newcastle where midtable finishes are acceptable, or potentially slip back to 1990's Everton where the relegation threat is always there.

Moyes took the club from bottom half strugglers often looking over our shoulder at relegation to a consistent top 7 side with numerous finishes above the so called untouchable elite group of clubs now in the top 6 like Spurs and Liverpool. Martinez had one excellent season before turning us in to a bottom half shambles of a side two years running. We are now so far behind those top 6 it is embarrassing.

As I was going back earlier through the Fulham 2-2 Everton game back in 2012 for stuff on Fellaini seeing an infuriating draw where we inevitably did that typical Everton thing where we threw away a great chance to push on, I couldn't help but notice this:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/20107627

'Despite climbing to fourth in the table after stretching their unbeaten league run to seven games, this was definitely a case of two points dropped for Everton, who dominated from start to finish.'

Oh how I wish a frustrating draw left us in 4th position these days and hear an opposition manager say:

"Everton dominated us, all we could do was try to be positive. They are a very good footballing team. They are a settled team and know exactly what to do. Normally we are a good team, but I couldn't see that today."

We finished 6th that season, finishing above the RS where it was probably considered an underachieving season. Yet under that fraud Martinez we'd suffer a frustrating result like the above and end up in 13th at the end of it with no hope for the rest of the season. I know which I preferred.

None of this post has any relevance to the thread....
 
You really are deluded when it comes to Martinez, especially when hearing your views on David Moyes who progressed the club in a way Roberto Martinez could only dream of. By the end of Moyes' tenure it did feel like him moving on was right for all involved. In hindsight though, the day Moyes left was the day our decline started and instead of stability we've now had 3 car crash seasons in 5. Unless Moshiri can utilise his finances appropriately to turn the current mess around, then we will end up as just another (Premier League version of) West Ham or Newcastle where midtable finishes are acceptable, or potentially slip back to 1990's Everton where the relegation threat is always there.

How is that the case though? The season after he left we played better than we had ever played since the days of HKI and won more games and piled up more points than Moyes was ever able to achieve in a season?

The day our decline set in can be traced from the Spurs away game in RMs second season, IMO. That Spurs game showed up the weaknesses in our game with those particular players who were unfit for purpose against that type of pressing. Martinez's biggest mistake was not clearing the decks when in a position of strength in his first full summer here - get shut of the Moyes deadwood that he'd incredibly gotten a great season out of and demand cash to buy players who could play the way he wanted. The bottom fell out of the Martinez era because the players simply would not or could not carry out a plan handed to them.
 
I totally disagree with this...you only need to look at the facts;

Season 1 Martinez spent about 20mil and brought in 40mil approx.
Season 1 Koeman spent about 77mil and brought in 55mil

Season 2 Martinez spent about 35mil and brought in 2mil
Season 2 Koeman spent about 155mil and brought in 90mil

In comparable terms Koeman had a positive swing of 42mil year one and 33mil year 2.

Also Koeman was able to sell Stones and Lukaku (who Martinez had developed) benefitting from Lukaku's goals as well.

Clearly if Martinez had failed so badly then the improvements in those two players wouldn't have net us an approx 90mil profit enabling Koeman to waste it on total overpriced dross (bar Pickford).

Also, in his first 2 seasons Martinez signed 10 players and Koeman has signed closer to 20...theoretically gutting the squad and signing his own players who 'should' have fit his strategy and playing style...

The only comparatively large signing was Lukaku under Martinez...


I personally believe that if after Martinez finished 5th he was given similar backing in the transfer market he would have achieved success.

Lol guess what if Moyes was given the money not Martinez. It seems some fans are trying to rewrite the history. 11th and 21 wins in 2 seasons were not that bad is it?

You are still ignoring the fact that Koeman needed to work under a director of football. Second, there are massive inflation in the transfer market in the last couple of years. Thirdly, Koeman's spending was granted by Moshiri while it's the new owner decision to sack a crap manager in Martinez after 2 years of crappiness. How can you compare the money spent in 2013 and 2017 and made it out there is no inflation is literally laughable.
 
Moyes's approach.

Dinosaur football that near killed Man Utd, West Ham and Real Sociedad, and did kill (forever it looks like) Sunderland.

But keep up the adulation of a man who's the laughing stock of football.

You’re absolutely right D. Can’t believe how many people still want to worship Moyes...a decade of absolute dross, no more entertaining than the rubbish we see now.
Job for the Moyes can’t recall anything as bad as the Europa exit....needs to replay the thrashing that Moyes’ Everton received at Goodison from Martinez’s Wigan.
 
How much they spent + how many players they bought + who has improved the players...

Martinez took over an ageing punching above its weight side and added a couple of relative big money signings a season.
Koeman bought in almost an entire team for huge money and had the benefit of stones money and a developed lukaku




two points you do not aware -- lol

Koeman worked with Walsh so to blame everyone on him is unjust -- Lookman/Pickford/Gana signed by Walsh and the rest by Koeman....Williams, Cuco, Bolasie, Schneiderlin etc lol

There are a massive inflation in the transfer market in the last couple of years so £13m spent in 2013 for McCarthy probably worths more than double in 2017. -- McCarthy signed for 13mil and Arsenal wanted him for 20mil+ lukaku signed for 27mil and sold for 75mil+ lol

Stones was a Moyes signing -- Developed by Martinez. lol again


Oh and good, resorting to question the duration of my supporting the team is the best you can do. I probably support Everton longer than you. -- Its a statement, if you keep slating Martinez off but have been championing Koeman, Bolasie, Cuco and others then its totally bizarre. Any fan who watched Mike Walker and Walter Smith sides for example would laugh at your comparisons.

I dislike Martinez because he was full of crap and he took the team backwards, simple. -- Fabulous, can you add in a list here of every Everton manager in your supporting history who you've not thought was 'full of crap'....

Oh so you know which signings were signed by who. Unless you are those people who are right up at the club then clearly you made up the list and used that as the "evidence" to backup your case. Lol. I thought you are better than that.

How on earth do you know Arsenal wanted McCarthy for £20m other than some journo made up the news and you read that on the internet and believed in it. When did Arsenal put in a bid? Can you answer? No.

Tell you what I was championing Koeman last season for getting 7th and I was championing David Moyes for what he had done to this club but certainly I would not championing a crap manager and made it out 11th and 13th was alright.
You are totally bizarre because you said I was championing Bolasie and Martina when there is nothing you can say and all you can do is assuming something I did not say.
 
Last edited:
Revisionist nonsense about Martinez. He was a poor manager who recruited poorly and played garbage football. Ditto Koeman, ditto Allardyce. None of them are good enough.

Some apologists might think 21 wins in 75 were alright afterall.

If Moyes was given the money of Koeman then what would happen?
 
How is that the case though? The season after he left we played better than we had ever played since the days of HKI and won more games and piled up more points than Moyes was ever able to achieve in a season?

The day our decline set in can be traced from the Spurs away game in RMs second season, IMO. That Spurs game showed up the weaknesses in our game with those particular players who were unfit for purpose against that type of pressing. Martinez's biggest mistake was not clearing the decks when in a position of strength in his first full summer here - get shut of the Moyes deadwood that he'd incredibly gotten a great season out of and demand cash to buy players who could play the way he wanted. The bottom fell out of the Martinez era because the players simply would not or could not carry out a plan handed to them.

I can definitely agree on that regarding the Martinez era. I think McCarthy going off at Wolfsburg played a big part of that. I was at that game in Wolfsburg where it felt like an era of enjoyment was about to begin, and we took the lead against Spurs with a great striker from Mirallas. Once we fell to pieces in that game, our decline did seem to start.

Regarding your last point though, the players acted disgracefully in terms of their effort levels towards the end but Martinez was a cause of it, albeit not the whole problem. Alienated certain players like Baines and had no idea how to hold on to leads which was evidenced on so many occasions - the notable ones being Arsenal (H), Kiev (A), Stoke (H), Bournemouth (A), Chelsea (A), Man City (A) in the Cup SF, West Ham (H).
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar Threads

Welcome

Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.

🛒 Visit Shop

Support Grand Old Team by checking out our latest Everton gear!
Back
Top