Squad - what squad?!!

Status
Not open for further replies.
I've liked a lot of the things you post, don't agree with a lot of it in this thread but the above in particular is a stupid attempt at.. well I don't even know what.
Supporting Moyes is supporting the board?? Really?
No.. supporting the manager is supporting the manager, supporting the board is supporting the board, the two are not as intrinsicly linked as you seem to think and are two very different entities. I don't hear too many singing the praises of the baord for getting 4th spot back along for example.
Any new manager would also tow the line as its their job! If they don't, they deserve to be sacked. His job is not to influence the board into getting more funds, its to do his job with the funds given. His job is not to slate the owners of the club or make demands on the board, his job is to acheive the targets the board set, something he has done well.
I cannot believe that people genuiinely believe Moyes is the problem for not joining the 'I hate Kenwright' crusade.

It was a bit too provacative, fair enough. I was getting hyperbolic.

The point I was rather hamfistedly trying to make was that Moyes is a part of the regime and every time he makes a statement about his bond with the chairman and what a good blue he is, while feeling free to critisise the fans who also pay his wages, he's shoring up the board. I don't think you can seperate one from the other as cleanly as some want to.

He had no problem playing games with his contract until he got a pay rise.

The difference is that Moyes is much better at his job then the board and a much more honorable and honest person but they're still the same basic axis who are responsible for our club's midtable mediocraty. I'd prefer a clean slate.
 
People ****ging Moyes off for the 5 man midfield is nonsense. It was generally a very attacking 5 man midfield and now look at how many teams play a similar formation? My only issue was when he shoved Neville in to play with Fellaini or Heitinga but I think thats probably a question mark on his confidence on Rodwell to handle premiershipship games. Im talking ****e. Its too hot

I was reading a post from our Finnish correspondent which showed on analysis Alexander Song made more through ball passes than either the entire everton midfield or the entire team (can't recall).

I really think we're set up defence first and foremost.
 
The 5 man midfield that Moyes prefers is a defensive ploy,that being when we don't have the ball we play a 5 man midfield,however when we have the ball then a a 4 man midfield is adopted with the 5th man joining in the attack in a 4 4 2 formation.
Last season this role was filled by either Cahill or Fellaini .
With Regards to Moyes salary constantly being quoted as excessive,he's probably on no more money than your average premiership player,by no means do I consider this excessive.
Moyes achieves minor miracles on what is a shoestring budget,something his peers in the LMA are aware of when they vote for their manager of the year.
My job entails a lot of travelling and working away,the vast majority of fans from other clubs I speak to, hold Moyes in high regard.Wish a had a tenner for the amount of times I've heard "Good manager Moyes does a great job with no transfer budget"
Yet I come on this forum an others,to read the same old agenda driven drivel from what it would seem is the BU followers/supporters.
 
My job entails a lot of travelling and working away,the vast majority of fans from other clubs I speak to, hold Moyes in high regard.Wish a had a tenner for the amount of times I've heard "Good manager Moyes does a great job with no transfer budget"
Yet I come on this forum an others,to read the same old agenda driven drivel from what it would seem is the BU followers/supporters.

It's amazing that when the opinion of people who watch the team every week differs from those who watch them twice a year, you decide the latter is the more informed opinion.
 
It's amazing that when the opinion of people who watch the team every week differs from those who watch them twice a year, you decide the latter is the more informed opinion.

exactly, we're the ones who know best. he does well on a limited budget, but look at the squads he has had, they really have been good enough to win a trophy in that time. he sets the team out not to lose rather than win sadly. you can't not lose success, only win it
 
It's amazing that when the opinion of people who watch the team every week differs from those who watch them twice a year, you decide the latter is the more informed opinion.

"Good manager Moyes does a great job with no transfer budget"

I think the people who have that view are those who spend all day watching videos of Alan Shearer ging his "expert" analysis on MOTD.

Not that they're wrong, he does. However there is so much more to Moyes a manager than just that.
 
The LMA and their members,also hold the same opinion of Moyes as I do.
Now how many games do they watch per season,and try to counter Moyesies tactics as rival team managers.
But of course you all know better than those Managers,or at least think you do.
 
The LMA and their members,also hold the same opinion of Moyes as I do.
Now how many games do they watch per season,and try to counter Moyesies tactics as rival team managers.
But of course you all know better than those Managers,or at least think you do.

I think he deserved it all three years he won LMA manager of the year, unfortunately the last of those was three years ago. He hasn't been keeping up to those standards of late.
 
Okay this is going to be a long one. I am going to make a pledge here that I am taking a one year break from arguing about Moyes in terms of his historical performance v. others. I reserve the right to talk about team selection or things which are actually happening NOW (and definitely will argue about the board and how they suck at everything) but in terms of shouting at people who like to pretend Moyes doesn't have the best record of any club with similar resources ... I'm done. It never gets us anywhere and as I point out below I think a few people are just grasping at straws to find any kind of stick to beat Moyes with. I will think up a suitable punishment for myself if I break this promise. Perhaps a donation to the site? This also means any of you can have the last word here ... strawman away.

Royle was here only two years and we won a trophy and finished 6th
Joe Royle didn't get abducted by aliens immediately after 1995 though. He managed other teams. He got City promoted twice (although he never actually won a lower league title after 1991) but then got them relegated. He has generally failed to set the world on fire elsewhere. So if the point is that he's a better manager then why isn't he a better manager? If you have one year where he won a Cup then decades of not winning anything in the top division do you believe the decades of evidence determine his record or the one year? I'd love a Cup but there is a lot of luck involved -- I do not believe every manager who has won a Cup is a great manager (or that they are automatically better than those who haven't won a Cup yet). If you do then that's fine -- I'd suggest you shouldn't run any other aspect of your life in such a illogical sample size blind manner but this is football fandom so a little illogical favouritism is okay.

Look at Joe Royle's record for his entire career. If Moyes left and we hired a person with that record (not Joe specifically) would you be happy? Honestly. Not some snide "he won a Cup once which is more than Moyes" argument. Forget Joe for a second. Our new manager won a Carling Cup but got three teams relegated and never finished higher than 13th in the league. Happy? If not then stop going on about one-off Cup wins or one-off Euro qualifications (that's coming up later). They are one-offs! They prove nothing. If anything they are arguments for MY side ... that there is nobody consistent out there.
Righto. Stoke, Birmingham, the RS, Newcastle and Fulham have played in Europe either this year or last.
But none of those teams (aside from arguably the RS but they have a huge amount of money compared with us) have managed consistent success at Euro qualification. You must realize that's a crazy argument. If this were three or whatever years ago you'd be saying "Villa and Portsmouth are playing in Europe so FFS Moyes." But they haven't sustained the success and that basically helps proves the point you are trying to argue against -- that people can't sustain success without money. Do you honestly believe Stoke, Fulham and Birmingham will be playing consistently in Europe over the next five years? If you don't then why not? Because they don't have a good manager or they don't have the money to sustain success? What is the point? They are just one or two year outliers and soon they will regress to the mean just like Villa, Portsmouth and the parade of teams who have one decent year every now and again which doesn't prove anything. I'm not being argumentative -- I genuinely don't understand the point of this argument. It seems crazy to me and proves the point you are arguing against more than the argument you are trying to make. Maybe I'm an idiot but I just don't get it.

Case in point ... didn't Fulham finish eighth and qualify by fair play? What does that prove? It's arguments like that which seem more about having a vendetta than honestly judging someone's record. Do you want us to finish lower in the league, get less cards AND then just pray that the Prem's card rate (or however that thing is determined) is low enough to warrant a fair play spot? Would that prove something about Moyes being a better manager? No it wouldn't. So why is it a valid argument against him?

Sometimes 7th gets a Euro place and sometimes it doesn't ... is Moyes a better manager in years when things completely out of his control conspire to make more spots be Euro spots? If 7th gets Euro one year and not the other is the manager of the team who got 7th in the year it happened to be a Euro spot better than the one who missed out (but had more points)? It's insane troll logic.
Is it? Ok, maybe there's another stick to beat him with. Given that he constantly states that he determines who goes in or out of the club player-wise, he's had 10 years to craft whatever side he wanted to. That's more than enough time to nail down whatever football philosophy he has in place and to play consistently throughout the whole of the season. Why hasn't he got that in place? He's been 'time rich' and that's an asset the vast mjority of managers never get in the premier league.

He's built the most consistent no money team in the Prem. There is no team which spends less (or even the same or even slightly more) with such a consistent record. You have to go to teams spending tens if not hundreds of millions of more to find a better record over a significant sample size. I know it's 7th place trophy stuff which gets everyone's panties in a bunch but the fact is there are some teams which spend less, as much, or slightly more than us and every single one of them without exception has not been more consistently successful. One or two years of a good run doesn't count. The only teams above us in the ten years are teams which spend way more. People are bringing up French leagues -- they are just not as competitive as the Prem -- that's not being jingoistic it's a fact. Does the 8th place team in France spend as much on players as the RS? It's a laughable comparison. This league is insanely deep and rich. Maybe we should give France a shot actually.

The reason other managers aren't time rich is they get fired for not being consistent (the only exception perhaps being O'Neill although he saw the writing on the wall and got out before he was fired for poor results because the board wasn't going to be supporting him financially). Honestly, why do you think there is no other manager as time rich for non-top four/six clubs? Would Stoke (or a similar club) fire a manager for finishing fifth-seventh too much? These managers are getting fired for not being able to complete consistently at the top without the resources. You are proving my point -- it's just not possible and if it was there would be another team to point to (not just hey look at Newcastle they had one good season ... Villa had three good seasons where are they now?).

The point I was rather hamfistedly trying to make was that Moyes is a part of the regime and every time he makes a statement about his bond with the chairman and what a good blue he is, while feeling free to critisise the fans who also pay his wages, he's shoring up the board. I don't think you can seperate one from the other as cleanly as some want to.
What's the alternative? A manager who fights the board at every turn and gets fired in under a year? Aside from making the club very unstable what will that accomplish? Are you hoping the more pro-board fans would realize the board is the problem and try more to force them out? That's what I already want! I don't know what the end game is with a manager who fights against the board aside from something it's theoretically possible to accomplish with Moyes too without risking relegation which could come from a new manager every year because guess what -- they are demanding money which does not exist. "I'll quit if you don't spend more on players." "Okay then bye." If you think they have a hundred million to pump into the squad and aren't doing so because Moyes doesn't push them enough well ... okay. They don't. Looking up the technical net worth of our technical board members is pointless -- they don't want to put it into Everton no matter what someone they hired to do a job says or doesn't say to or about them.

Okay that's that. Have fun cats and kittens. I am going to try to enjoy this season of Everton playing football.
 
Im by no means anti-moyes , sometimes he frustrates me but im not campaigning to have him sacked or anything. I'll be honest though i do find the fact that a manager of a club that has never won a trophy is apparently beyond criticism a bit puzzling especially when you look ar some who have lost their jobs anyway having read here about the LMA awards Joe kinnear , frank Clarke , dave jones , Peter Reid , Alan Curbishley , George Burley and Steve coppell are all previous LMA winners as well.
 
I lost a lot of respect for Moyes when he refused to sign a new contract with the club that first gave him a a chance at top flight football. sceondly kept him on even after we finished 17th and third he hasn't won anything for and therefore forced our board to make him the 7th best paid manager in the world on more money than trophy winning managers playing in the latter sdtages of the world cup and the champions league.
 
And btw, njligernj, the specific argument I was arguing against was that it was impossible for us to qualify for europe even once, which is just stupid given we were only 45 minutes off doing it. It wasn't a general argument but a specific counter.
 
Living off past glories is for kopites.

I judge Moyes season by season.

And I mean SEASON. Not just post-Christmas.
 
**** money.

Money is for crap managers who need to be able to throw £30 million at a player and hope they work out.

Moyes is better than that though, he is one of the most talented managers in the prem at buying quality players for comparetively little money, for that he deserves all the praise he gets.

Other teams, in fact most spend more money than us yet every season we finish above teams who have done so, yet still you get the excuse of teams having spent more money than us for why we didn't finish above certain teams.

As the senile old drunk over the park proved, its easy to finish above a team spending loads of money if they spend it on crap. Still didn't stop the excuses of money coming out when they beat us in the semi though.

Games aren't won by price tags, they are won by ability, once the players are signed its how you do with the players you have that you should be judged by. Thats where Moyes falls down imo.

He assembled a squad which outside of the top 4 was one of the best in the league. Overall in 10 years i'd say he has had 2/3, maybe 4 seasons where he excelled with the squad, the rest he either had us where we should of been based on talent or below where we should of been.

Then add in cups and overall i'd say he has been poor. 24 attempts, 3 semis, 2 losses and 1 win. After that, numerous embarassing exits.

In building a squad year after year the guy does a great job and fully deserving of the praise. Its what he does with that squad where he lets himself down. Doesn't do the worst job, but isn't the "god" some people think he is.

Unfortunatly in the position the club is in right now its his skills which are way more important than his flaws.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar Threads

Welcome

Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.

🛒 Visit Shop

Support Grand Old Team by checking out our latest Everton gear!
Back
Top