Stats don't always tell the full story Legs.
The weekly ONS survey testing doesn't show a great increase in infection rates, apart from in Scotland. Most of the rises in infection around the country can be linked to the Indian variant, and those worst hit have been targeted with surge testing. Firstly, it's reasonable to assume that if you are testing in the correct area's, and in the right way (these are being carried out by the army), then the testing will uncover significant numbers of positive samples, many of which will also be asymptomatic. There's also evidence over the last week that this surge testing is starting to win battles with the 3 most prominent areas effected by the Indian variant, Bolton, Bedford and Glasgow, all seeing infection rates plateau and start to fall. Another badly hit area, Blackburn, has seen a significant slow down too.
Infection rate is still continuing to rise in other areas of Scotland, Lancashire, West Yorkshire and the East Midlands, and to a lesser degree in some area's of the South East, but if they apply the same tactics in those areas I'm confident they can keep a lid on it. I hate to say it, and some on here may not like it, but Boris's wackamole may actually be working.

There are 2 factors all the areas of concern have in common. One is the take up of vaccines is significantly less than the national average, and the second is that there are communities where a large percentage of multi generation high occupancy living conditions. Some areas, such as Sefton who showed early signs of problems with the new variant, have practically erased the problem now and I believe that is down to not having the two factors mentioned above.
I honestly believe that the majority of the country will be Ok with this Indian variant because of the high level of vaccination take up and lower density of housing occupation. The Kent variant is already well and truly beaten.