There's no doubt in my mind that was the case.
They keep saying they're guided by science but the science simply gave choices - they made a political decision to follow one thing over another.
They only changed course when told bluntly that their course of action would mean around 500000 deaths.
It would be a suspicion, maybe fair or unfair. I tend to agree, i dont see scientists getting it so badly wrong and changing so quickly, i think there was a suite of options available to politicians and they went with the gung ho one or what they thought looked like the clever political one with all the potential political collateral and grandstanding there was there, it backfired horribly and the wrong one taken initially from a public health perspective, but thankfully got there in the end.
That period though i think is one that needs to be scrutinized, perhaps independently, as either the politicians or the scientists made a massive impactful error and here we are, cant see it happening though.
You get the feeling that Boris's high profile early media stuff initially in this crisis will haunt him for a long time, if and hopefully when he makes a full recovery.