Current Affairs Weinstein II

[tsubaki]

My point is valid, and I'll tell you this, if a lad down my street was accused of rape on a date, and it turns out the said alleged victim continued to meet up with him for several months to have sex it would be dismissed rather quickly.

... and if the lad down your street had done the same to dozens of victims, paid out millions in non disclosure agreements, hired private detectives to dig dirt on / spread rumours about the victims and was recorded by one on tape admitting what he did?

Or how about the lad down your street employing the victim and getting her to sleep with him so she could stay in her job?

 

[Prevenger17]

Mate I knew when I was typing it I'd get load of wokes crying you can't say that, well I'm saying it.

She was raped, but continued for months of her own free will to meet up in hotel rooms and have sex with him.

Has a women ever lied about being raped?, have innocent blokes been banged up for rape?

How many women rape victims do you read about being date raped, and then continue to meet up with alleged rapist for months and continue to have sex with them, and send flirty messages to him prior to meeting up.

Because of the publicity involved in this matter Weinstein had zero chance of a fair trial in these cases, has he raped women whose cases have not made it to court, probably, but in the case I have highlighted, I have a big problem with someone crying rape, then meeting up for months to still have sex with their alleged rapist, I think she was trying to further her career by having sex with him, totally her choice to do so.

And that's the last I'm saying on it.

Lol. You can scour the internet folks, but you won't find a more robust defence of a proven serial rapist and sex offender than this. What a hill to die on

 

[tsubaki]

Lol. You can scour the internet folks, but you won't find a more robust defence of a proven serial rapist and sex offender than this. What a hill to die on

It’s “wokes” that did it for me, fantastic work.

 

[Prevenger17]

It’s “wokes” that did it for me, fantastic work.

Interestingly, he believes the accusers when they are male and the accused hasn't been convicted. Make of that what you will.

If it all came out he's as bad as Saville without doubt, there will be loads of others out there with similar stories.

The Documentary was very believable and looking at past court cases, accusations, definitely no smoke without fire, when caught he had the money to keep himself out of jail.

Apparently "no smoke without fire" reasoning is enough for him in this case. What gives?

 

[JimmyJeffers]

Interestingly, he believes the accusers when they are male and the accused hasn't been convicted. Make of that what you will.





Apparently "no smoke without fire" reasoning is enough for him in this case. What gives?

He’s had his masculinity called into question a few times. All starting to make sense now...

Current Affairs - Harry and Megan part 2 (Electric Boogaloo)

She is a piss poor actress who has played her cards very well, not the first bird to marry for money and status. Harry has been played like a fiddle, behaving like a 16 year old with his first glance at a snatch, absolutely pussie whipped to within an inch of his life. William told Harry he...

www.grandoldteam.com

 

[Charro]

Wokes hahah

Imagine the type of person to try and point the finger at the victims in all this.

 

[Prevenger17]

He’s had his masculinity called into question a few times. All starting to make sense now...

Current Affairs - Harry and Megan part 2 (Electric Boogaloo)

She is a piss poor actress who has played her cards very well, not the first bird to marry for money and status. Harry has been played like a fiddle, behaving like a 16 year old with his first glance at a snatch, absolutely pussie whipped to within an inch of his life. William told Harry he...

www.grandoldteam.com

He has been spurned many times in his life, no doubt. It's the only way his attitude towards women can be explained.

 

[dead_soft]

My point is valid, and I'll tell you this, if a lad down my street was accused of rape on a date, and it turns out the said alleged victim continued to meet up with him for several months to have sex it would be dismissed rather quickly.

And it is views like this that make it so difficult for victims to come forward. People stay married to their abusers, psychological control is a real thing, divorcing yourself from the reality of the situation is a real thing, it's absolutely boggling that you refuse to look at any evidence or research or the fact that he's been found guilty just so you get to try and minimise how truly devastating rape is and how spectacularly complex and difficult a situation it is.
Listen to people who know what they are talking about rather than repeating your garbage.

 

[Death]

Tarantino will be gutted. Tried his best to hide Weinstein's sexual abuse for decades.

Another tyrant who’s being sexually exploiting actresses feet for years.

 

[davids]

@OnlyBlueWillDo behaving v oddly here, I'm wondering what his motivation is myself. Usually a guy who goes to such great lengths to defend a convicted sex fiend has a few skeletons himself imo

That's a cheap shot,the forum is a place to air views,some you agree with some you don't.Believe it or not there are still a few who think Delph was a worthwhile signing,but that's their opinion.

 

[dead_soft]

That's a cheap shot,the forum is a place to air views,some you agree with some you don't.Believe it or not there are still a few who think Delph was a worthwhile signing,but that's their opinion.

It's not a cheap shot, it's perfectly valid to question the motives of his defence. I'd certainly question the motives of anyone who wants Delph to carry on at Everton.

 

[davids]

It's not a cheap shot, it's perfectly valid to question the motives of his defence. I'd certainly question the motives of anyone who wants Delph to carry on at Everton.

All about opinion.

 

[dead_soft]

All about opinion.

It's not though. It's been proven time and time again that victims will sometimes feel unable to cut contact or are able to disassociate from the act. His 'opinion' is provably wrong. So it's worth questioning his motive

 

[davids]

It's not though. It's been proven time and time again that victims will sometimes feel unable to cut contact or are able to disassociate from the act. His 'opinion' is provably wrong. So it's worth questioning his motive

.Would you question it to his face? Always my rule of thumb

 

[dead_soft]

.Would you question it to his face? Always my rule of thumb

Yes, of course I would, why wouldn't I? Is he going to threaten me?

It's always an odd 'you wouldn't say it to his face'. I wouldn't walk up to Tyson Fury and tell him his views on homosexuality are bigoted, but that doesn't mean my thoughts are wrong or shouldn't be aired.