Current Affairs Weinstein II

[Death]

Rikers is an awful prison, notoriously bad conditions for the inmates.

Rikers Island - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Rikers Island has a reputation for violence, both abuse and neglect of inmates, attracting increased media and judicial scrutiny that has resulted in numerous rulings against the New York City government, and numerous assaults by inmates on uniformed and civilian staff, resulting in often serious injuries. In May 2013, Rikers Island ranked as one of the ten worst correctional facilities in the United States, based on reporting in Mother Jones magazine.[11] Violence on Rikers Island has been increasing in recent years. In 2015 there were 9,424 assaults, the highest number in five years.

Weinstein has yet to go there yet and I doubt he is faking the symptoms, going there even for a night would terrify me.

Harvey Weinstein is still hospitalized. Here's what his attorneys say about his chronic health issues

Newly convicted rapist Harvey Weinstein was supposed to be locked up on Rikers Island by now. Instead, the former movie mogul is in a Manhattan hospital, one day after his convictions for first-degree criminal sex act and third-degree rape.

www.cnn.com

He just needs to become the hardest mans girlfriend and his life will be much better. He should cozy up to the Weinstein of the prison. Pretend like he’s an actress trying to get a roll and show him the night off his life.

 

[Walken]

.Would you question it to his face? Always my rule of thumb

Thats a truly dreadful rule of thumb and just empowers bullies

 

[davids]

Thats a truly dreadful rule of thumb and just empowers bullies

People bully in lots of different ways,would appear of late the keyboard method is on the up.

 

[Walken]

People bully in lots of different ways,would appear of late the keyboard method is on the up.

No doubt about that but the ' say it to my face' idea is a nonsense, the inclination being the threat of physical violence preventing people calling his nonsense on his internet forum any less valid. Internet forums are a different social interaction to a public one, and this forum in particular is well moderated to prevent bullying

 

[davids]

No doubt about that but the ' say it to my face' idea is a nonsense, the inclination being the threat of physical violence preventing people calling his nonsense on his internet forum any less valid. Internet forums are a different social interaction to a public one, and this forum in particular is well moderated to prevent bullying

The poster made a reference to Tyson Fury.Now if an interviewer asked him a reasonable question as to where his views on homosexuality came from,I'm fairly sure Mr Fury would trot out the usual biblical and cultural line. But saying something like,
"Listen to people who know what they are talking about rather than repeating your garbage".or if the questioner suggested that his views in some way were hiding a different agenda,then the response might be slightly different.
Hence why online, people tend to be more free in making sly innuendos than they would in a face to face situation

 

[Walken]

The poster made a reference to Tyson Fury.Now if an interviewer asked him a reasonable question as to where his views on homosexuality came from,I'm fairly sure Mr Fury would trot out the usual biblical and cultural line. But saying something like,
"Listen to people who know what they are talking about rather than repeating your garbage".or if the questioner suggested that his views in some way were hiding a different agenda,then the response might be slightly different.
Hence why online, people tend to be more free in making sly innuendos than they would in a face to face situation

Also just as likely we'd all be less inclined to call out a overtly homophobic remark face to face by 6ft 8in behemoth due to intimidation. Doesn't mean it shouldn't be called out or wouldn't be in a well moderated internet forum.

 

[davids]

Also just as likely we'd all be less inclined to call out a overtly homophobic remark face to face by 6ft 8in behemoth due to intimidation. Doesn't mean it shouldn't be called out or wouldn't be in a well moderated internet forum.

As I said most people asked a reasonable straight forward question will give a reasonable (by their standards) answer, be they 6'8" boxers or football forum members,but suggesting that their however misguided opinion was hiding a more sinister agenda really isn't on.

 

[Walken]

As I said most people asked a reasonable straight forward question will give a reasonable (by their standards) answer, be they 6'8" boxers or football forum members,but suggesting that their however misguided opinion was hiding a more sinister agenda really isn't on.

Given the context provided by posters for that particular posters history it's a legitimate accusation, and given the forum it was asked the same it to his face line is posturing nonsense.

 

[davids]

Given the context provided by posters for that particular posters history it's a legitimate accusation, and given the forum it was asked the same it to his face line is posturing nonsense.

But what was the accusation? seemed a few members made sly innuendo but nothing that the said member could answer (if he was bothered enough)

 

[Walken]

But what was the accusation? seemed a few members made sly innuendo but nothing that the said member could answer (if he was bothered enough)

So you want to talk specifics over something that is a rule of thumb to you?

 

[davids]

@OnlyBlueWillDo made some comments that I don't agree with,but it didn't lead me to infer he had any issues, as some other posters seemed to suggest. Might have been interesting to have had some clarity,but then again it's not that important to me.

 

[Prevenger17]

But what was the accusation? seemed a few members made sly innuendo but nothing that the said member could answer (if he was bothered enough)

Based on the poster in question's posting history, I was implying that he has an overwhelmingly negative view of women and probably struggles to form any sort of relationship with them. His seeming need to pipe up aggressively about the likes of Meghan Markle, and the rape victim in this instance, without even a shred of information that hasn't been gleaned from a Daily Mail front page is 100% weirdo behaviour and I would advise women in his neighbourhood to lock their windows and doors securely before they go to sleep at night. SAY IT

 

[davids]

Based on the poster in question's posting history, I was implying that he has an overwhelmingly negative view of women and probably struggles to form any sort of relationship with them. His seeming need to pipe up aggressively about the likes of Meghan Markle, and the rape victim in this instance, without even a shred of information that hasn't been gleaned from a Daily Mail front page is 100% weirdo behaviour and I would advise women in his neighbourhood to lock their windows and doors securely before they go to sleep at night. SAY IT

Very interesting professional insight.Not a Daily Mail reader myself,but interesting that you appear to think that 1.17 milion people don't have a right to an opinion however misguided.I brought up the case in one of my classes and you'd be surprised at the views that females can hold on some of the rape victims,but then maybe they all read ABC España.

 

[Prevenger17]

Very interesting professional insight.Not a Daily Mail reader myself,but interesting that you appear to think that 1.17 milion people don't have a right to an opinion however misguided.I brought up the case in one of my classes and you'd be surprised at the views that females can hold on some of the rape victims,but then maybe they all read ABC España.

Honestly no idea what you're on about.

 

[Prevenger17]

Thats a truly dreadful rule of thumb and just empowers bullies

Such an odd individual. I thought the last of the "SAY IT TO MY FFFFAAAAACEEEE" type of posters died out with the proboards and geocities era of the internet, but life finds a way