Current Affairs Weinstein II

Status
Not open for further replies.
i suggested I do because I do , that’s why I wrote it.

yeah good luck to you if the females or even the males surprise you with their opinions on anything I look forward to not reading about it .
Was there something about it not being in English that you didn't understand?
 
Was there something about it not being in English that you didn't understand?

do you see what you posting something and not expanding has Done , it’s basically derailed it so we best leave it .

Although being honest I’m fascinated by what they thought that doesn’t have an English translation. Was it Depaysement ? Guess I’ll never know
 
do you see what you posting something and not expanding has Done , it’s basically derailed it so we best leave it .

Although being honest I’m fascinated by what they thought that doesn’t have an English translation. Was it Depaysement ? Guess I’ll never know
The fact you think that the idioms of every language can been translated into English is odd,so looks as if you will never know.
 
A tonne of witness and victim testimony you weren't privy to, having not been in the courtroom

Well, clearly but what actual evidence has been stated?

As far as i could tell it was a pair of women who didnt report him but now came forward as past victims -- though the timeframe to punish had expired.

Then two more whose claims were thrown out...

Finally two others whose testimony was picked up as having changed and seemingly highly unlikely.

Id have expected some evidence to send him down...doesnt seem as clear cut as expected.
 
Well, clearly but what actual evidence has been stated?

As far as i could tell it was a pair of women who didnt report him but now came forward as past victims -- though the timeframe to punish had expired.

Then two more whose claims were thrown out...

Finally two others whose testimony was picked up as having changed and seemingly highly unlikely.

Id have expected some evidence to send him down...doesnt seem as clear cut as expected.

Zat defending 1 of the biggest sexual predators of the last 30 years.

Who would have thought it.
 
Well, clearly but what actual evidence has been stated?

As far as i could tell it was a pair of women who didnt report him but now came forward as past victims -- though the timeframe to punish had expired.

Then two more whose claims were thrown out...

Finally two others whose testimony was picked up as having changed and seemingly highly unlikely.

Id have expected some evidence to send him down...doesnt seem as clear cut as expected.
 
Well, clearly but what actual evidence has been stated?

As far as i could tell it was a pair of women who didnt report him but now came forward as past victims -- though the timeframe to punish had expired.

Then two more whose claims were thrown out...

Finally two others whose testimony was picked up as having changed and seemingly highly unlikely.

Id have expected some evidence to send him down...doesnt seem as clear cut as expected.


I think you and @OnlyBlueWillDo should meet up and acquit him in your imaginary trial with all the evidence you have from newspaper articles
 
Zat defending 1 of the biggest sexual predators of the last 30 years.

Who would have thought it.

Im not defending anyone.

What i am doing is asking what the evidence was as from what i read...it seemed like there wasnt anything clear...however the 'me too' movement made it seem like the guy was a cert to be sent down...with clear evidence.

I cant see what sent him down? Have you got the link to any evidence ?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.

🛒 Visit Shop

Support Grand Old Team by checking out our latest Everton gear!
Back
Top