Current Affairs Weinstein II

Status
Not open for further replies.
Very interesting professional insight.Not a Daily Mail reader myself,but interesting that you appear to think that 1.17 milion people don't have a right to an opinion however misguided.I brought up the case in one of my classes and you'd be surprised at the views that females can hold on some of the rape victims,but then maybe they all read ABC España.



To paraphrase you, you’re not being clear what views the females hold on rape victims , go on be brave

You're not making it clear what you believe his motives are though,go on ,be brave.
 
They don't post here so the question is irrelevant.

Ok sorry about that .

it was more you’d pulled a poster about what you claimed was him being vague or hinting about things but not saying it then you made a post where you seemed to allude to something but didn’t specify what it was you were alluding to . Just seemed a bit peculiar given your earlier stance .
 
Ok sorry about that .

it was more you’d pulled a poster about what you claimed was him being vague or hinting about things but not saying it then you made a post where you seemed to allude to something but didn’t specify what it was you were alluding to . Just seemed a bit peculiar given your earlier stance .
He'd made a post about a forum member here.So hardly the same thing.
 
He'd made a post about a forum member here.So hardly the same thing.

ah ok but posts in the forum can be vague just not about people . I’m with you , is there a full set of rules I can have a look at ?

personally I was just interested what opinions these ‘females’ in your class hold on the rape victims but suppose I’ll never know now . Disappointed if I’m honest , feels like it may have been illustrative .
 
ah ok but posts in the forum can be vague just not about people . I’m with you , is there a full set of rules I can have a look at ?

personally I was just interested what opinions these ‘females’ in your class hold on the rape victims but suppose I’ll never know now . Disappointed if I’m honest , feels like it may have been illustrative .
As the discussion was in the local language that doesn't always translate well into English would be a bit of a waste of time to recount it. suffice it to say the 'females' in the group held views that I found surprising about the women who had been assaulted.
 
As the discussion was in the local language that doesn't always translate well into English would be a bit of a waste of time to recount it. suffice it to say the 'females' in the group held views that I found surprising about the women who had been assaulted.

but you finding it surprising doesn’t really tell me anything does it ? It’s like you giving a statement telling the police the attacker was the same height as your dad ,unless they ask how tall your dad was it’s kind of useless .
 
but you finding it surprising doesn’t really tell me anything does it ? It’s like you giving a statement telling the police the attacker was the same height as your dad ,unless they ask how tall your dad was it’s kind of useless .
As I said,different language,and although not covered by confidentiality in any way,what's said in the classroom stays there.I was surprised though.
 
As I said,different language,and although not covered by confidentiality in any way,what's said in the classroom stays there.I was surprised though.

probably best not to vaguely hint at it then as let’s be candid it’s done absolutely nothing to move the conversation forward and imparted no further information. I know you seem quite strict on forum etiquette and giving advice so I know you’ll take this on board , might be worth considering whether it’s of any value to the debate before posting .
 
probably best not to vaguely hint at it then as let’s be candid it’s done absolutely nothing to move the conversation forward and imparted no further information. I know you seem quite strict on forum etiquette and giving advice so I know you’ll take this on board , might be worth considering whether it’s of any value to the debate before posting .
Think you'll find the mods are the arbiters of forum etiquette,and since when have posts had to "move forward" a conversation? Don't you ever read the rest of the forum? A high percentage are just repeat posts slagging off some of our midfield regulars.
 
Think you'll find the mods are the arbiters of forum etiquette,and since when have posts had to "move forward" a conversation? Don't you ever read the rest of the forum? A high percentage are just repeat posts slagging off some of our midfield regulars.

Yeah absolutely I mostly post incoherent rubbish .

sorry I thought it was you pulled the other poster on his post and advised him On his posting style so thought you felt that was the way it should work or you wanted it to . Not my intention to be rude obviously wasn’t you .
 
Yeah absolutely I mostly post incoherent rubbish .

sorry I thought it was you pulled the other poster on his post and advised him On his posting style so thought you felt that was the way it should work or you wanted it to . Not my intention to be rude obviously wasn’t you .
Nobody suggested you posted "incoherent rubbish" you seem to be trying to find something in my posts that isn't there,but good luck anyway.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.

🛒 Visit Shop

Support Grand Old Team by checking out our latest Everton gear!
Back
Top