Current Affairs Weinstein II

[davids]

Yes, of course I would, why wouldn't I? Is he going to threaten me?

Obviously I believe you would.
How on earth would I know that,just as much as you know if his posts hold ulterior motives

 

[dead_soft]

Obviously I believe you would.
How on earth would I know that,just as much as you know if his posts hold ulterior motives

I didn't say I know. I said it raised questions.
You're not making a great deal of sense

 

[davids]

I didn't say I know. I said it raised questions.
You're not making a great deal of sense

What questions does it raise?

 

[dead_soft]

What questions does it raise?

If someone is repeatedly defending an abuser, despite all evidence and proof to the contrary, who is repeatedly told that he is wrong about victims not going back to their abusers. If that person them makes it very local to them. It raises the issue of their motives because there is no real reason to believe the victim is in the wrong.

 

[davids]

If someone is repeatedly defending an abuser, despite all evidence and proof to the contrary, who is repeatedly told that he is wrong about victims not going back to their abusers. If that person them makes it very local to them. It raises the issue of their motives because there is no real reason to believe the victim is in the wrong.

You're not making it clear what you believe his motives are though,go on ,be brave.

 

[Disgruntledgoat]

If someone is repeatedly defending an abuser, despite all evidence and proof to the contrary, who is repeatedly told that he is wrong about victims not going back to their abusers. If that person them makes it very local to them. It raises the issue of their motives because there is no real reason to believe the victim is in the wrong.

Look, he just really liked Shakespeare in Love, okay?

 

[Yarrgh]

Another tyrant who’s being sexually exploiting actresses feet for years.

Really? Terrible if true. I suppose it will come out if it's true.

 

[dead_soft]

You're not making it clear what you believe his motives are though,go on ,be brave.

'be brave' - alright edgy pal. I'm questioning what his motives are. I'm asking what they are.

 

[davids]

'be brave' - alright edgy pal. I'm questioning what his motives are. I'm asking what they are.

But you are still asking a very open question,being more specific might get you a more meaningful response.But in saying that I doubt he's interested in what you post anyway.

 

[dead_soft]

But you are still asking a very open question,being more specific might get you a more meaningful response.But in saying that I doubt he's interested in what you post anyway.

Ha ha, telling people how to post. Silly boy.

 

[Death]

Really? Terrible if true. I suppose it will come out if it's true.

Oh, it’ll come out alright.

 

[davids]

Ha ha, telling people how to post. Silly boy.

How was I telling you how to post? just a suggestion.You're safe behind your keyboard,so let it rip.

 

[LinekersLegs]

Glad the scumbag got what he deserved but what sort of prison will he be going to? Sounds silly I know but I just hope that it won't be a comfortable one like the Wolf of Wall Street ended up in.

Rikers is an awful prison, notoriously bad conditions for the inmates.

Rikers Island - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Rikers Island has a reputation for violence, both abuse and neglect of inmates, attracting increased media and judicial scrutiny that has resulted in numerous rulings against the New York City government, and numerous assaults by inmates on uniformed and civilian staff, resulting in often serious injuries. In May 2013, Rikers Island ranked as one of the ten worst correctional facilities in the United States, based on reporting in Mother Jones magazine.[11] Violence on Rikers Island has been increasing in recent years. In 2015 there were 9,424 assaults, the highest number in five years.

Weinstein has yet to go there yet and I doubt he is faking the symptoms, going there even for a night would terrify me.

Harvey Weinstein is still hospitalized. Here's what his attorneys say about his chronic health issues

Newly convicted rapist Harvey Weinstein was supposed to be locked up on Rikers Island by now. Instead, the former movie mogul is in a Manhattan hospital, one day after his convictions for first-degree criminal sex act and third-degree rape.

www.cnn.com

 

[tremont]

If someone is repeatedly defending an abuser, despite all evidence and proof to the contrary, who is repeatedly told that he is wrong about victims not going back to their abusers. If that person them makes it very local to them. It raises the issue of their motives because there is no real reason to believe the victim is in the wrong.

He is not so much defending Weinstein, as he is questioning the victimhood of the woman. Do you honestly think the jury didn't wonder why this woman continued to have sex with the guy, and send flirty emails? Those are valid questions.

Weinstein is scum, but it doesn't mean anyone alleging abuse, shouldn't be questioned about their actions.

 

[dead_soft]

He is not so much defending Weinstein, as he is questioning the victimhood of the woman. Do you honestly think the jury didn't wonder why this woman continued to have sex with the guy, and send flirty emails? Those are valid questions.

Weinstein is scum, but it doesn't mean anyone alleging abuse, shouldn't be questioned about their actions.

I’d probably stop short of questioning victims who have been proven right in a court of law.
It is well known that victims can continue to interact and have relationships with their abusers. That you or he still cannot understand this and want to challenge it is your own issue.