Well aware of who/what they are, but also well aware of how they are trained and very much doubt they'd get battered so quickly and so easily.Spetsnaz units are as far as Russian military philisophy is concerned the “tip of the spear”.
Go back to the early airborne assault Hostomel airfield just NW of Kyiv. That was a key target. They would have made up a large portion of the assault troops in that engagement.
Fact is they got battered. Take nothing from them though - they just didn’t get any armour to support them and the Ukes steamrollered them.
Also imagine being the Russians, knowing where you're going and sending in your special forces... with no support and no armor. How does that sound like that?
I don't, for a second, believe they were really spetsnaz, or at least not fully trained ones - in a "desperate to impress" army your training ending 6 months or whatever earlier just so that you're the lowest rank in the spetsnaz unit; can see it. My uncle was a higher up in our army and he's confirmed to me they've done questionable things like that before (even comically promoting someone on the spot to the rank above so they can send him in to report something he knew nothing about only to get humiliated and punished without his knowledge etc.). This is post-Soviet here, so I'd imagine Putin will no doubt sign off on that. Keep in mind that as long as he had an excuse to bomb more (which "they took down our spetsnaz" basically is) - he would have.
Point is, maybe sending the 'spetsnaz' was a bit of a mind game - sure, maybe there was a few of the actual ones here, but the rest... nah. The airport is Russian now anyway, so maybe if information comes out at a later point - we'll see.
Of course, I might be insanely wrong, which I hope I am - the Ukrainians defending legitimate spetsnaz would be better for their morale then them finding out they defeated units of... kids in SWAT gear.
