It's what he actually said, just the latest high profile gaffe of manyIs this parody or some form of meta-comedy?
*not complete
Lavrov threatening nuclear war again:
‘World War 3 will be nuclear’ Lavrov issues chilling warning to West | World | News | Express.co.uk
AN ESCALATION of the Russian-Ukrainian war to involve other global powers will involve mass destruction through nuclear weapons, Russia's Foreign Minister has said.www.express.co.uk
Meanwhile an overnight opinion poll puts trust in Putin by the Russian people at 70% a 10% increase since the start of the war:
https://www.statista.com/statistics/896181/putin-approval-rating-russia/
Obviously the steady stream of propaganda on Rossiya 1 is working
I know what you mean. Conflicts in the East have a habit of being brutal. Reminds me of the WW2 German attack on the Soviet Union, Operation Barbarossa, this was not particularly an operation to conquer but antihalationI've seen the images of the damage being inflicted on ukrainien cities.
This wanton destruction of buildings and infrastructure just makes me angry.
I just can't see the point of it
is there any military advantage in destroying a city before occupying it.
He said he wasn’t there to conquer it. No one listened of course.I think it's time to start coldly considering the possibility that Putin is not in Ukraine to conquer it. He may be there to make limited terriorial gains in the east, and raze its major cities otherwise.
Reports out of Kharkiv and Mariupol seem to support this. It looks like Kyiv is next.

He stated that he was not there to hold terrain. One can conquer dirt, then give it up once the political objectives are attained. See: Germany, West.He said he wasn’t there to conquer it. No one listened of course.
Yup he's resorted to blowing the crap out of everything. Ukraine's cities will end up looking like Grozny. However in order to control those bombed out cities he will have to send troops in at some point and that means payback time for the Ukes.I think it's time to start coldly considering the possibility that Putin is not in Ukraine to conquer it. He may be there to make limited terriorial gains in the east, and raze its major cities otherwise.
Reports out of Kharkiv and Mariupol seem to support this. It looks like Kyiv is next.
To be fair it’s standard Soviet playbookYup he's resorted to blowing the crap out of everything. Ukraine's cities will end up looking like Grozny. However in order to control those bombed out cities he will have to send troops in at some point and that means payback time for the Ukes.
Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.