Current Affairs Ukraine

Status
Not open for further replies.
Meanwhile back in Ukraine:

Russia has taken to cobbling together bits of old tanks and ships to make new tanks!

Their latest invention is this hideous contraption of an Mt-lb chassis with a naval gun turret welded on top😲

Is this yet another sign that they are running out of heavy equipment?

View attachment 206030
Looks like something the orcs from Lord of the Rings would make. Which is quite apt, when you think about it.
 
Meanwhile back in Ukraine:

Russia has taken to cobbling together bits of old tanks and ships to make new tanks!

Their latest invention is this hideous contraption of an Mt-lb chassis with a naval gun turret welded on top😲

Is this yet another sign that they are running out of heavy equipment?

View attachment 206030
It’s probably very effective against infantry and light armour, would love to see one go over any bumps or up any inclines 🤣
 
I thought it was whimsical at first until looking at your other posts. You need to be a little clearer in your delivery if you want to be taken credible especially in this thread.

in that case I can only advise actually reading my other posts, and redefining what "pro-Russian" and "hates the West" mean to you.

It seems to me that "pro-Russian" means "doesn't automatically believe what 'experts' post on Twitter and gleefully repeats it as fact" and "hates the West" means "points out what the West has and is doing wrong".
 
in that case I can only advise actually reading my other posts, and redefining what "pro-Russian" and "hates the West" mean to you.

It seems to me that "pro-Russian" means "doesn't automatically believe what 'experts' post on Twitter and gleefully repeats it as fact" and "hates the West" means "points out what the West has and is doing wrong".
What is the West doing wrong? Should they stay out of it and have a nation obliterated from the face of the Earth.

They at first provided sanctions to stymie the war machine and tyranny of Russia. They have provided Ukraine with defensive weapons for protection and have stated many times for use only to gain back territory forcibly taken by the aggressor and not to attack mainland Russia.

You cannot reason with the upper echelon of Russia. They only know force and even then, they lead their own to slaughter. They will have to be soundly defeated to not have aspirations of attacking NATO and its alliance. Watch what they do not what they say. Time will tell if Ukraine even survives if they don't you need to be on edge.
 
What is the West doing wrong? Should they stay out of it and have a nation obliterated from the face of the Earth.

They at first provided sanctions to stymie the war machine and tyranny of Russia. They have provided Ukraine with defensive weapons for protection and have stated many times for use only to gain back territory forcibly taken by the aggressor and not to attack mainland Russia.

You cannot reason with the upper echelon of Russia. They only know force and even then, they lead their own to slaughter. They will have to be soundly defeated to not have aspirations of attacking NATO and its alliance. Watch what they do not what they say. Time will tell if Ukraine even survives if they don't you need to be on edge.

Well:

i) for a start, once the war started there should have been immediate efforts in the West (and especially here) to boost defence production for everything we might need, and might be able to offer Ukraine. This didn't happen for months and is only starting to happen now.
ii) we should also have strongly considered looking at whether sanctions should have been employed once the war actually started, and whether alternate means (refusal to buy Russian products, refusal to provide Russia with products) would have been more effective at preventing damage here;
iii) we should have understood our actual strengths and weaknesses vs Russia - the biggest advantage we have is cultural; Russians even now see themselves as European, they consume Western entertainment products and brands, listen to Western music, play Western games etc etc. One of the big reasons why the Soviet Union crashed is because people were exposed to an alternate type of living that was more appealing to them (indeed the threat of that is what drove Putin to this, I think)
iv) in terms of actually supplying Ukraine, we should have worked out in advance better logistical pathways - as in, rather than supplying them with dribs of this sort of artillery piece and drabs of this sort of artillery piece and this other country is supplying tiny amounts of this sort of artillery piece, sufficient quantities of one sort of item should have been supplied. This works with standardized ammo but needs to be expanded to everything else.
v) we need to understand how this war is being perceived outside of the West - nearly everyone wants it to end, but they see Ukraine refusing to negotiate. I agree that Russian proposals probably aren't serious, but when Ukraine refuses to talk it removes the opportunity to expose that to the world, and especially to the Russia-friendly states like the BRICS. The mooted peace format that Lula was proposing should be welcomed and encouraged, if only because Putin is likely to make fools of them.
 
I agree in the logistics department. In fact, most NATO countries didn't realize how weak and antiquated the conventional forces of Russia had become as the Russian media spin has now fallen flat to their superiority. In preparation, the US, UK and Canada have been training the Ukrainians since the 2014 Crimea incursion. So, if this was NATO sponsored hats off to them for as those tactics have thwarted a greater adversary with supposedly a greater army with armament. In fact, just the removal of Russian air superiority has led to a grind it out affair for perhaps many years to come.

The limited budget of NATO since the dissolution of the Soviet Union has been the greatest threat to the West as the US hegemony as you say has had to be the stop gap to serve and protect the West. At the moment in the protection mode weapons are being supplied to counter the additional troops called up by Putin. I think it will become clearer as the wet weather subsides and a potential counterattack will start to unfold what is really necessary. If the scenario develops into WW1 trench affair, then the necessary air support from the West will be required. Special F-16's to my understanding are being constructed as we speak to counter the Russian numbers and destroy the Kerch Bridge to keep Putin and his cronies from reloading. But this will take time.

Under the circumstances NATO has bounced back from a sleepy start and are understanding now what is at stake with an overrun Ukraine. Take note of the previous Soviet satellites raising the awareness to hoodwinked France and Germany after they were shocked Putin would actually attack. I think now most nations in the West will have to rethink their prior strategies and future needs. Weaning from the rich mineral deposits available to the West from Russia will
perhaps be the biggest hurdle for most citizens as prices will rise in an inflationary environment.

In conclusion, Putin will only resort to peace if he has exhausted all his military options. He is an empire builder ex-KGB and weaves lies like he really believes them. Some say he is so deluded he doesn't trust anyone. Hearsay perhaps, only History will know the final facts.

Ukraine hates their guts. So, an impasse will remain until they are exhausted, or we are unable to help due to some circumstance.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.

🛒 Visit Shop

Support Grand Old Team by checking out our latest Everton gear!
Back
Top