So he's not very good, but has built a squad that you think should be winning things off his own back?
Should also of been a lot closer than a final we lost by one goal with our best players missing?
Plenty of worse teams with worse records as well as the occasional flukey ones that you refer to.. How many teams have spent what we have or less and won more than one cup.. i.e not a fluke?
We're 5th best club in the country because of him by the way.
I never said anywhere in that post that "he wasn't very good", and i'd have thought it was obvious that when i referred to the quality of the teams he's had/has that he was responsible for doing so.
So yeah, he's responsible for assembling on numerous occasions top quality teams who have finished regularly in the top 8, often top 6 yet he's
not responsible for the fact those same quality teams have never actually won anything under him?
He responsible assembled those teams with bugger all money, managed to regularly finish higher in the league than teams who spent more than him but he's
not responsible for those teams not winning a trophy because other teams spent more money? And teams who spent less money did, and have equalled or outdone his overall performances in the cups?
Now i'm not as harsh on him for not winning soemthing as Summerskin is, i'd still deem his time here a "success" for everything else he's done, but that still doesn't change how he has done such a good job in the league yet such a poor job in the cups.