Neither. Need to stop hiring managers who have taken teams down. We should be scouring the continent for the next Pochettino type who would love a crack at the PL rather than always playing it safe looking for someone with PL experience.
Even if Everton were, it wouldn't satisfy the fan base.
Case in point with Pochettino: I was active on a couple of spurs-related message boards when Sherwood got booted (I don't bother as much these days), and I remember the rumours at the time - it was de Boer vs Pochettino, according to the papers. This was Pochettino who, to a spurs fan, had Southampton playing above their station, but they'd flop in the last 10 mins and drop points. The majority wanted de Boer.... "what has Pochettino even done?" and "not good enough". This was based on the ~30% win ratio at Espanyol, and ~38% at Southampton, with the only noticeable factor being that Espanyol were skint, and he got the Southampton lads individually good enough to be start a transfer conveyer-belt to the North West.
I'm not even going to start thinking what it was like as a Saints fan, seeing Adkins get the promoted twice and have a 50%+ win ratio, then swapped for a young guy who had managed a lower league La Liga side in an "OK" fashion (to the casual observer).
With someone like Pochettino, it's a combination of chance, patience and trust. He didn't hit the ground running at Spurs, and had little pedigree in management before then, so even if you took a time machine back to January 2013, and someone got Pochettino to wait for
Moyes to saunter off to fill Fergie's bum dent, there's very little to support the theory that there wouldn't have been uproar from the fan base, and a P45 within half a season.
I genuinely think Silva looks to be the closest "style" of manager to Pochettino, but he hasn't shown any evidence of loyalty deep down. In contrast, Pochettino would probably still be in Southampton if Cortese had stayed.
