Allardyce v Silva Conundrum

[BiggyRat]

The Managers role is clearly a pivotal position, but I can't help but think that the 'cattle on the paddock' wouldn't even respond to the best of them! This is a catch 22 of course in that replacing certain players with better ones relies heavily on the Management team in place...what a conundrum we find ourselves in!

Here I was thinking Moshiri's money was the beginning of our salvation.

 

[VentureBrosEFC]

Really? So now trying to change "the terms" because you dont like the fact you got called out on it. YOU were the one who started associating a "specific occupation" with the world at large when you said " If someone other than by the strictest most semantically blunt definition "failed" they normally don't get a better higher paying job"

And so now humans dont do human things like other humans? What reason do you have to suggest the absurd notion where humans that manage football aren't like humans that manage companies. Because humans do humans things, always have and always will. You wont even begin to understand people until you understand those simple fact that drives the decisions of everyone in every profession. You started it, Ill finish it.

Silva failed twice by the definition of the word, which the Oxford Dictionary says #1 is "Lack of success", and you said I lied about that.

Hilarious jackass. You argue like an idiot who twists words and misrepresent ideas to win an internet debate. Also congrats on being able to "finish it" ... so sad.

If you think all humans act in predictable patterns other than in a meta sense then you're probably someone that doesn't understand and is afraid of how complex the world is. Laughable that you'd try and define human nature, let alone with circuitous "reasoning". Humans do human things because they're humans.

Brilliant.

Idiot.

 

[Boss_Blue]

Really? So now trying to change "the terms" because you dont like the fact you got called out on it. YOU were the one who started associating a "specific occupation" with the world at large when you said " If someone other than by the strictest most semantically blunt definition "failed" they normally don't get a better higher paying job"

And so now humans dont do human things like other humans? What reason do you have to suggest the absurd notion where humans that manage football aren't like humans that manage companies. Because humans do humans things, always have and always will. You wont even begin to understand people until you understand those simple fact that drives the decisions of everyone in every profession. You started it, Ill finish it.

Silva failed twice by the definition of the word, which the Oxford Dictionary says #1 is "Lack of success", and you said I lied about that.

Hilarious jackass. You argue like an idiot who twists words and misrepresent ideas to win an internet debate. Also congrats on being able to "finish it" ... so sad.

If you think all humans act in predictable patterns other than in a meta sense then you're probably someone that doesn't understand and is afraid of how complex the world is. Laughable that you'd try and define human nature, let alone with circuitous "reasoning". Humans do human things because they're humans.

Brilliant.

Idiot.

I'd wait until the summer to make a shout personally...


...lads?

 

[VentureBrosEFC]

I'd wait until the summer to make a shout personally...


...lads?

We're going 12 rounds ... or until we're thread banned.

 

[Boss_Blue]

We're going 12 rounds ... or until we're thread banned.

*pulls up chair

 

[Boss_Blue]

Silva to Southampton being touted in the rags today.

Does that change anyone's decision on whether to keep hold of Sam until the summer?

Does anyone even really care?

 

[Toffe3m4n]

Silva to Southampton being touted in the rags today.

Does that change anyone's decision on whether to keep hold of Sam until the summer?

Does anyone even really care?

No and no.

 

[Boss_Blue]

No and no.

Thought not.

 

[Papa Shango]

Silva to Southampton being touted in the rags today.

Does that change anyone's decision on whether to keep hold of Sam until the summer?

Does anyone even really care?

We will get him after he gets sacked for taking Southampton down.

 

[PeregrineT]

I'd wait until the summer to make a shout personally...


...lads?

Oh happily, time finds all fools out.

 

[Tennessee Blue Mike]

Good grief what a mess we are in. Silva would be a step up from Allardyce boring us to death.

 

[PeregrineT]

Hilarious jackass. You argue like an idiot who twists words and misrepresent ideas to win an internet debate. Also congrats on being able to "finish it" ... so sad.

If you think all humans act in predictable patterns other than in a meta sense then you're probably someone that doesn't understand and is afraid of how complex the world is. Laughable that you'd try and define human nature, let alone with circuitous "reasoning". Humans do human things because they're humans.

Brilliant.

Idiot.

You are an utter fool, and thats saying something on this forum.

But time will show that, lets see what happens.

 

[magicjuan]

Prefer Fonseca to any of the options but if it is to be Silva get him involved behind the scenes, let him see the truth of the situation and then overhaul once the last ball of the season has been kicked.
It'll be hard enough reshaping with the WC on.

 

[4737carlin]

Silva to Southampton being touted in the rags today.

Does that change anyone's decision on whether to keep hold of Sam until the summer?

Does anyone even really care?

No, if they are dumb enough to take him let them, just means Liverpools feeder club will find it harder to find players for them once they go to the championship

 

[overkill]

upload my image on image website