Current Affairs Ukraine

Status
Not open for further replies.
Let's see if that's correct.

There's been no affirmation that the policy has not changed.

I fear that the first time we realise it has changed is when there's a report of long range weapons being used to attack Russian military bases and supply lines...which will inevitably escalate to their use on Russian civilian populations.

The Ukrainians are after mission creep - they see this as the first step to drag NATO into the conflict they're losing.
I think until there is a definite shift in the diplomatic position, we have to assume there isn't one.

As you say, the first hint of a UK missile hitting Russian territory will be that line crossed. Which, in my opinion will be a mistake.

But, I don't think we can seriously suggest that the UK would be acting without any Russian provocation.
 
Oh behave Dave

If you dont think the Russian state has enough sleepers in this country ready to detonate devices in UK cities to avenge any attacks on Russian cities you're clearly naive.

The equation is this simple: connive to bomb Russian cities = chaos will be unleashed on your cities.

I would expect an extensive terrorist campaign across western European cities.
 
If you dont think the Russian state has enough sleepers in this country ready to detonate devices in UK cities to avenge any attacks on Russian cities you're clearly naive.

The equation is this simple: connive to bomb Russian cities = chaos will be unleashed on your cities.

I would expect an extensive terrorist campaign across western European cities.

I'm currently sat here just shaking my head reading your post Dave
 
I think until there is a definite shift in the diplomatic position, we have to assume there isn't one.

As you say, the first hint of a UK missile hitting Russian territory will be that line crossed. Which, in my opinion will be a mistake.

But, I don't think we can seriously suggest that the UK would be acting without any Russian provocation.
They're using some pretext that Russia has crossed a line by receiving Iranian missiles.

Permission to use British weapons inside Russia will come with a consequence attached to it.

I mean, everyone on here who hates Putin do so because they state he's a maniac who'll stop at nothing. So there's absolutely no room for those people to now doubt he wouldn't activate a series of reprisal attacks in western Europe and deny they have their source in Moscow.

Two things happen now before the US Presidential elections:

1/ long range missiles strike deep into Russia.

2/ Russian assets inflict chaos on western European cities with a series of terrorist attacks.

IMO nothing can stop 2/ if 1/ happens.
 
They're using some pretext that Russia has crossed a line by receiving Iranian missiles.

Permission to use British weapons inside Russia will come with a consequence attached to it.

I mean, everyone on here who hates Putin do so because they state he's a maniac who'll stop at nothing. So there's absolutely no room for those people to now doubt he wouldn't activate a series of reprisal attacks in western Europe and deny they have their source in Moscow.

Two things happen now before the US Presidential elections:

1/ long range missiles strike deep into Russia.

2/ Russian assets inflict chaos on western European cities with a series of terrorist attacks.

IMO nothing can stop 2/ if 1/ happens.
So appeasement? Of a man who will stop at nothing...
 
I'm currently sat here just shaking my head reading your post Dave
I get what you mean in terms of Russian supporting posts, but he's just stating facts? Is it so difficult to believe that bombing Russian cities won't lead to retaliation regardless of whether you believe it's justified or not? I thought that was just...what happened in a war?
 
They're using some pretext that Russia has crossed a line by receiving Iranian missiles.

Permission to use British weapons inside Russia will come with a consequence attached to it.

I mean, everyone on here who hates Putin do so because they state he's a maniac who'll stop at nothing. So there's absolutely no room for those people to now doubt he wouldn't activate a series of reprisal attacks in western Europe and deny they have their source in Moscow.
I rather dislike Putin, as I've stated a fair few times, however I suspect you'll find it difficult to find where I've taken such a stance. I dislike him as he's a bully.

Personally, I'm an advocate of allowing Ukraine to use western weapons further into Russia, but the caveat is that it's not free rein - it has to be within a framework.

Ukraine may want to use them however they wish, yet that's never going to happen. I doubt it's less about Russian retaliation, and rather domestic politics!

Medvedev has already shown recently that he (and Russia) can show a level of composure when discussing nuclear weapons, so it really isn't on the cards...

... unless something absolutely drastic occurred. But the use of these weapons, in the rear, will only help weaken Russia further and help bring about a speedier end.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.

🛒 Visit Shop

Support Grand Old Team by checking out our latest Everton gear!
Back
Top