Current Affairs Ukraine

Status
Not open for further replies.
I can’t be too sure it was a long time ago but I think I read Nato USA did like a war game simulation. a few years ago where if Russia nukes a member they nuke Belarus in response. I am sure that’s only if they nuke a none nuclear member. I think personally if they nuke any member with nukes they will be getting one sent straight back. Anyway it’s been said many times if Russia nukes Ukraine NATO won’t respond with one but by destroying the Black Sea fleet.
 
I can’t be too sure it was a long time ago but I think I read Nato USA did like a war game simulation. a few years ago where if Russia nukes a member they nuke Belarus in response. I am sure that’s only if they nuke a none nuclear member. I think personally if they nuke any member with nukes they will be getting one sent straight back. Anyway it’s been said many times if Russia nukes Ukraine NATO won’t respond with one but by destroying the Black Sea fleet.

That scenario was in Sir John Hackett’s book “The Third World War”, where Minsk was hit after the Soviets had hit Birmingham.
 
Again, it’s not “to defend Russian soil” in that doctrine; its to defend the existence of the Russian state.

Personally I think Crimea is where one is most likely to be used, but even then would be a huge risk in these circumstances - they’d have advertised their weakness to the entire world (as they’d have had to be defeated on the battlefield to have reached that point).
I'd suggest that defending Russian soil and defending the Russian state are intertwined. Hope we don't have to find out.
 
It’s hard to see it being a threat to the existence of the state, but I agree I hope we don’t have to find out.
Sadly that would depend on Putin's interpretation and given that defeat in the Donbass would fairly obviously lead to his downfall we have to join the dots.
 
Last year he was more explicit in fact:

When describing a possible strike on Ukraine, a Slavic neighbour which Putin describes as an artificial historical construct, Medvedev said NATO would not get involved in such a situation.

"I believe that NATO would not directly interfere in the conflict even in this scenario," Medvedev said. "The demagogues across the ocean and in Europe are not going to die in a nuclear apocalypse."

“Therefore, they will swallow the use of any weapon in the current conflict.”

You are quite right with that to be honest mate..
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.

🛒 Visit Shop

Support Grand Old Team by checking out our latest Everton gear!
Back
Top