Current Affairs Ukraine

Status
Not open for further replies.
The same Douglas Macgregor who found himself marginalised and over-looked for the top jobs at the Pentagon in favour of his ex mate Lt Gen Herbert McMaster?

The same Douglas Macgregor who is a cheerleader for Trump and MAGA?

The same Douglas Macgregor who now hangs out with his other looney, tinfoil-hat wearing chums at Grayzone (Max Blumenthal for one).

The same Douglas Macgregor who after seeing his military career side-lined now makes a living writing extreme alternative political literature - generally taking the opposite line to the general consensus and roping in other wannabe alternative conspiracy nut jobs?
No the other one.
 
So he's a liar then?

PS, he was a sh*t General as most Americans are.
I think he has adopted his alternative viewpoints and developed his own unique confrontational image purely as a means of income.

He’s learnt that being confrontational and adopting an alternative (sideways) looking viewpoint mixed with his own military background actually attracts human interest and interest means dollars. In the end it’s all about money.

I doubt he actually believes half the rubbish he spouts, but if it sells books and articles and gets him after-dinner speaking gigs then life is sweet for him.

I would be wary of a person who adopts a radical viewpoint (opposed to the main stream pov) solely on the basis that it makes them money.

He got found out in the US Army.
 
I'm sure that after everything dies down in the Ukraine we will see the full weight of Europe and the US and other allies thrown behind supporting militarily and economically the Palestinian right to not have it's land occupied and it's civilian population murdered on a daily basis.

To not do so would in essence make everything said about the reasons for supporting Ukraine a lie really wouldn't it?
They are two completely different situations, but let's not derail this thread.
 
I think he has adopted his alternative viewpoints and developed his own unique confrontational image purely as a means of income.

He’s learnt that being confrontational and adopting an alternative (sideways) looking viewpoint mixed with his own military background actually attracts human interest and interest means dollars. In the end it’s all about money.

I doubt he actually believes half the rubbish he spouts, but if it sells books and articles and gets him after-dinner speaking gigs then life is sweet for him.

I would be wary of a person who adopts a radical viewpoint (opposed to the main stream pov) solely on the basis that it makes them money.

He got found out in the US Army.

Absolutely none of the media circuit former army/intelligence/government are worth a piss in the wind whichever side they're on, purely as they now make a fortune by being an acceptable 'expert opinion' which given if you stray from the media narrative you just get blackballed from the lucrative
circuit.

Even the ones i like to listen to i include in that
 
Is this relevant to the thread ?
If not, kindly stop de-railing the thread !!

I was just wondering if the 10 pages or so about Brexit in this thread was 'de-railing' the thread? Or the 10 pages about Taiwan was 'de-railing' the thread?

Merseyside workers fought against Franco, is that wrong to mention that when people are saying the fascist Hitler loving Azov Brigade are heroes?

Or that Dixie refused to do the Nazi salute?
 
I was just wondering if the 10 pages or so about Brexit in this thread was 'de-railing' the thread? Or the 10 pages about Taiwan was 'de-railing' the thread?

Merseyside workers fought against Franco, is that wrong to mention that when people are saying the fascist Hitler loving Azov Brigade are heroes?

Or that Dixie refused to do the Nazi salute?

Take a week off Comrade.
 
Absolutely none of the media circuit former army/intelligence/government are worth a piss in the wind whichever side they're on, purely as they now make a fortune by being an acceptable 'expert opinion' which given if you stray from the media narrative you just get blackballed from the lucrative
circuit.

Even the ones i like to listen to i include in that

Absolutely nothing would improve global society and standards of governance more than "commentators", politicians, think tank wonks and the other talking heads being removed from the media. Alex Jones, Owen Jones, Van Jones, Nick Ferrari, that cretin Scarborough, Solovyov, Tucker Carlson, Paul Mason and the rest - put all of them in the bin.

The only people who should be asked their opinion on matters by the media are the people who actually know what they are talking about (so experts in the particular field in question) and random members of the public stopped on the street. If the expert needs an hour to explain in detail about a complex issue, they should be afforded that time.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.

🛒 Visit Shop

Support Grand Old Team by checking out our latest Everton gear!
Back
Top