Current Affairs Ukraine

Status
Not open for further replies.
OK, find where I cut and pasted it from, then. You made the allegation. Now you get to back it up.
Use more acronyms,it's the way it's done on this thread. You've a lot of stiff competition though,the man who invented Trident,the man who orchestrated the invasion of Iraq,it's going to be difficult for you to stand out...but I have faith you can do it.??
 
I'm going to keep asking the question,why no ceasefire?
Worthwhile don't you think?
I (and others) have already answered the question. 1) Because Ukraine and Russia are too far apart to mutually agree to one. 2) Because there is no external authority with the power to compel them to adhere to a ceasefire, particularly given the presence of a very large number of nuclear weapons on Russia's side of the ledger.

If you grow up in the West, you're used to living in a world where authority figures can escalate things up the chain to ever-greater levels of force to keep people in line. If you punch a schoolteacher, the police get called. If you hole up somewhere and put lives in clear and present danger, the police use a much greater level of force to sort you. If you have a whole cult resisting the police, they break out the tanks (eg: Waco). If an entire state resists the national government, we have civil war.

The international system has none of that. It has courts, but to be forced to appear one has to lose a domestic power struggle or catastrophically lose a war. The international system has armies, but no one wants World War III. Imagine your city as a place where the police can't make an arrest without the unanimous consent of the mayor and the city council, they aren't allowed to arrest the mayor or the city council even if they shoot someone dead on Fifth Avenue, and every one of those officials has pet constituencies that they protect in order to get re-elected. It's a largely lawless mess with very inconsistent rules enforcement, right?

Well, that's the international system for you.
 
With the eastern oblasts having 'referendums' and talk of Putin formally annexing the territory soon, it will legally allow him to send the new conscripts there.

Now, we know that they have already 'mistakenly' sent many conscripts to the front, but recent actions could be a precursor to filling the territories with grunts.

This may no longer be about winning their special operation, yet rather being able to have enough of a buffer to retain what they've annexed.

One could call it damage limitation, and perhaps that's why they're risking their air assets, shelling most of the front and sending lots of untrained men forward.
 
With the eastern oblasts having 'referendums' and talk of Putin formally annexing the territory soon, it will legally allow him to send the new conscripts there.

Now, we know that they have already 'mistakenly' sent many conscripts to the front, but recent actions could be a precursor to filling the territories with grunts.

This may no longer be about winning their special operation, yet rather being able to have enough of a buffer to retain what they've annexed.

One could call it damage limitation, and perhaps that's why they're risking their air assets, shelling most of the front and sending lots of untrained men forward.
Bluntly, it feels a lot to me like when the PRC sent people from the provinces into Tiananmen, because they knew good and darned well that the local army would balk at the order to clear the square.

I can see Putin fearing that conscripts from the more ethnically Russian parts of the country would balk at what he is presently asking them to do.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.

🛒 Visit Shop

Support Grand Old Team by checking out our latest Everton gear!
Back
Top