This American talk

Status
Not open for further replies.
That money was well spent by the time we brought Howard etc in.

Rooney went in in 2004, half the money went to the bank and the rest of the money went on shite like Beattie and Sion Davies.

We sold

Radzinski 1.7m
Rooney 28m
Graveson 2.5m
Bent 2.5m

We then Bought

Beattie 6m
Davies 3.5m
Kroldrup 5m
Arteta 2m
Neville 3.5m
Van der Meyde 2m
Johnston 8.6m
Lescott 5m

Sold 34.7m

Bought 35.6m

So we only spent just over 1m, We prob got that back with add ons from Rooneys contract
 
In 2004 we didnt give the banks money, its not untill 2010 that we started the trend of giving them money.

Up untill then, every penny of sales was given to Moyes.

Nonsense.

I think we were in far deeper **** with the bank back then than we are now, that's the closest we have ever come to going under.
 
We sold

Radzinski 1.7m
Rooney 28m
Graveson 2.5m
Bent 2.5m

We then Bought

Beattie 6m
Davies 3.5m
Kroldrup 5m
Arteta 2m
Neville 3.5m
Van der Meyde 2m
Johnston 8.6m
Lescott 5m

Sold 34.7m

Bought 35.6m

So we only spent just over 1m, We prob got that back with add ons from Rooneys contract

OK, if all of that expenditure is solely down to Rooney's sale, where did the money from the new TV deal go?

This is besides the point anyway, the latest TV deal is far more lucrative than anything ever seen before, and to say all the new revenue will go on other operating costs is nothing but pure nonsense.
 
I can see the point mate but every year a manager is only every two or three players away from the champions league positions , the title , promotion, safety etc.. It's just I think the nature of the business , the deluded buffoons across the park prove it year after year with their 'jigsaw signings' and "this is our year" rubbish.

I just think you can make an excuse that every year should be the one you go for it but if you want To have a club that is heading in the right direction (business wise) then you have to make tough decisions . However given the leadership & gaping holes in finance we appear to have I'm not sure it'd ever make any real difference to us sadly.

Reminds me, a red I know the other day came out with "If we can get Alonso back from Madrid on the cheap, I think we could be dark horses for the title, since no one would expect us." Genuinely.

But I totally agree, I mean you only have to look back to two summers ago when Arteta signed that new contract and people did already think we had the complete team and actually expected rather than hoped for top 4 and then we lost to Blackburn on the first day, to see how that is a very dangerous mentality.

That all said, I'm still going to be disappointed (shy of a major injury crisis) if we finish below Liverpool, Newcastle and even Tottenham this season and that is without any major signings and assuming the Rodwell cash is just used to sure up the defence and attack depth a bit.
 
We spent what we brought in, Or have a got that wrong?

Did half the Rooney money go to the banks?

If it did why would we then spend what we gave the banks back on players?
 
OK, if all of that expenditure is solely down to Rooney's sale, where did the money from the new TV deal go?

This is besides the point anyway, the latest TV deal is far more lucrative than anything ever seen before, and to say all the new revenue will go on other operating costs is nothing but pure nonsense.

The same place the money from the new deal will go.

On increased player wages and increased transfer fees.
 
We sold

Radzinski 1.7m
Rooney 28m
Graveson 2.5m
Bent 2.5m

We then Bought

Beattie 6m
Davies 3.5m
Kroldrup 5m
Arteta 2m
Neville 3.5m
Van der Meyde 2m
Johnston 8.6m
Lescott 5m

Sold 34.7m

Bought 35.6m

So we only spent just over 1m, We prob got that back with add ons from Rooneys contract

We came with failed meetings with the players and their people of signing Parker and Bellamy at that time , now that may really have made a difference
 
Its not nonsense, Del has just provided you with the figures.

I suggest you go and check them, then come back and say the magic words.

I've stated that the bank also had their chunk of the Rooney money.

Have you ever heard an ITK say that Rooney saved Everton? Well it certainly wasn't because he allowed us to sign Simon Davies and Per Kroldrup.
 
I've stated that the bank also had their chunk of the Rooney money.

Have you ever heard an ITK say that Rooney saved Everton? Well it certainly wasn't because he allowed us to sign Simon Davies and Per Kroldrup.

Show me where the banks took the Rooney money, Del has just shown that ALL of the money from the sale of Rooney, Graveson + others was ALL spent.

Show me the banks chunk, PLEASE.
 
OK, if all of that expenditure is solely down to Rooney's sale, where did the money from the new TV deal go?

This is besides the point anyway, the latest TV deal is far more lucrative than anything ever seen before, and to say all the new revenue will go on other operating costs is nothing but pure nonsense.

The new TV deals are ALWAYS much better mate....

Just follow that we make money from player sales or we're screwed. You wont go far wrong then unless we get investment/new owner etc.
 
We spent what we brought in, Or have a got that wrong?

Did half the Rooney money go to the banks?

If it did why would we then spend what we gave the banks back on players?

Because we are talking about expenditure taking place two years down the line, with money sourced from future revenues due to a new TV deal.

There was a new TV deal around that time 2006, possibly 2007, and I'm ****ed if you're all going to maintain that it all went on other operating costs, and none of it went on strengthening the squad.
 
Must have misread what he was writing then ?! No idea to be honest.....it like 12 hours ago in a 12 page thread.....

What I am saying is FINE people are excited about a Donovan or Dempsey signing....

IS THAT THE ONLY CHOICE ??

NO !

There are many other options out there.....just like in the spanish papers when Marca run a poll of fans who they want...player X or Y or Z

If there was only 1 option they would usually all say yes.

Do you want a new player = YES.

Do you want Donovan = YES

Not Do you want DONOVAN OR Emile Heskey / Michael Owen / Messi etc etc.

Yeah, I agree with you.

I think there are other\younger options out there that would be more suitable for our club.

Ignoring our financial situation I'd love to see us sign Donovan + Dempsey. They're great players and they would improve our team significantly but as you've pointed out already we've got an older squad.

What worries me is that we're going to have to replace them all at the same time if we don't start planning for it ahead of time. My heart says buy Donovan and Dempsey and make a push for the Champs League but my head says we should be investing in younger talent so we can generate the money to replace our older players in the future.

We either need to buy some younger talent now, get lucky and produce it from our youth team over the next couple of seasons or we may end up in serious trouble with our first team as I think we'll have to replace too many experienced players around the same time.
 
OK, if all of that expenditure is solely down to Rooney's sale, where did the money from the new TV deal go?This is besides the point anyway, the latest TV deal is far more lucrative than anything ever seen before, and to say all the new revenue will go on other operating costs is nothing but pure nonsense.

Keeping the club running at a guess, We run at a loss every season

Rooney money on tranfers, Everything else on debts and running the club,Would you agree??

As for "This is besides the point", No it isent,you are saying Everton will start spending money on players when that is something we have never done

We sell then we buy, Now a days we sell then we buy cheaper

FACT
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar Threads

Welcome

Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.

🛒 Visit Shop

Support Grand Old Team by checking out our latest Everton gear!
Back
Top