Current Affairs The 2020 United States Presidential Election

Status
Not open for further replies.
"Your opinion does not make you right. Just because you believe something to be true doesn't mean it is"

A LARGE % of these people think that the election was stolen. But let's not pass an election securities bill because it might not make them happy?

There's no "in my view" for a lot of these stances. They ARE wrong, I don't care if they THINK they are right. Flat-earthers are wrong. The end. Climate changers are wrong. The end.

Being gentle with a group of people who deny the very existence of reality is giving legitimacy to their thoughts. "ok, let's talk about why you feel that way". Reality has a liberal bias simply because the ones that are on the right typically deny most legitimate stances with no basis in fact.

Those people believe what they're told. They're easily led. They're given a scapegoat for anything wrong in their lives and told the other side will make their lives worse by 'leaders' who are power hungry or grifting for money.

In short, Trumps' base are largely uneducated.


If you just dismiss these people as idiots, they'll continue to be idiots and the problem never goes away, and they'll continue to find figureheads to reach out to for a voice. To use your "flat earther" analogy, what good has yelling at them that they're stupid ever done except increase their numbers? Or anti-vaxxers - actually dangerous - the more you dismiss them instead of reasoning with them, the more their numbers grow.

You fix that by giving wannabe dictators like Trump no ammo to fire. You improve their lives, reach out, reconcile.

Your ire shouldn't be directed at the everyday Republican voter - it should be at the people who exploit them. There's a huge difference between those two things. The vast majority of an electorate aren't the ones invading the Capitol; they're moderate who lean one way or another based on their personal circumstances.

It's not about being "gentle"; it's about being smart.
 
And, not for nothing, but like @Pittsburgh Footy kind of intimated, I'll give a rundown of how politics used to be vs now:

Dems: we want a tax relief bill for the middle class because trickle down economics isn't helping anyone

Republicans: but we'll have a big shortage in our taxes, how will we pay for it?


vs now

Dems: we want Medicare for all because health insurance is absolutely killing our entire country

Reps: KRAKEN, ELECTION STOLEN, BENGHAZI



There have been 400 pieces of legislation passed by the House that have simply been ignored by Mitch McConnell. These people have no interest in actually helping anyone. Mitch McConnell filibustered his own bill then, when he overrode Obama's veto of it, said "Obama didn't explain the ramifications of this" when it literally opened the US to lawsuits for attacks on foreign soil.

There is a massive and fundamental disconnect between reality and whatever world a lot of people on the right live in.
 
Every side always believes their cause is just. You think Republicans vote that way because they're innately evil? No, they vote that way as they genuinely believe that's what's best for society.

Are they wrong? In my view, yes. If I were an American, I'd be a Democrat all day long.

But what they believe is that what you call making things better would ultimately end up in societal destruction. The way you convert that mindset (and incidentally bring the Republican party away from extremes and more centre right) is by gradually making a success of it. One step at a time. No government is perfect, and for that reason when you get a radical government who goes for ideological broke, then when things go wrong the ideology itself is blamed.

It's why I said there's never a "good" riot, because no matter the cause that underpins it, its still a bloody riot and it therefore tarnishes that support. Hence why you see Extinction Rebellion people pulled off trains and battered for wanting to save the planet; because constant, annoying protests tarnish and overshadow the whole message.

Politics - good politics - is all about nuance. Fighting some battles, leaving others, understanding that the overarching aim is to win an ideological war. This view has been completely and totally lost in the last few years as everyone pitches their tent on one "side" and wants to destroy the other.
Like your idealism, but its been the same since this planet has existed.
An asteroid would probably be the only solution

Namaste
 
What's has happened since Trump isn't "politics" as usual. That's the point.

I long for the days when republicans and democrats could argue over policy. That's long gone. The republicans have completely lost their minds.
That's not saying democrats are the antithesis of what republicans are - they aren't angels. Democrats are regular politicians. Which makes them, on the whole, palatable. They are the "only game in town", to use an American term, for anyone who is sane and has any heart whatsoever

So what's the answer to that? Just call them "crazy", "insane", completely dismiss them?

I get the appeal, I really do. Hence:

At this point I think anyone voting for Trump is mentally ill.

... I have those moments.

But, when you actually think about it, what does dismissing his voters like that actually achieve? That's all I'd ask people to think deeply about - think about the current situation, and think about what your solution would actually turn out achieving.

Because, for me, if we just keep doing the same thing over and over again, Trump 2.0 is here in a few years and this time it might actually be a competent dictator.
 
Those people believe what they're told. They're easily led. They're given a scapegoat for anything wrong in their lives and told the other side will make their lives worse by 'leaders' who are power hungry or grifting for money.

In short, Trumps' base are largely uneducated.


If you just dismiss these people as idiots, they'll continue to be idiots and the problem never goes away, and they'll continue to find figureheads to reach out to for a voice. To use your "flat earther" analogy, what good has yelling at them that they're stupid ever done except increase their numbers? Or anti-vaxxers - actually dangerous - the more you dismiss them instead of reasoning with them, the more their numbers grow.

You fix that by giving wannabe dictators like Trump no ammo to fire. You improve their lives, reach out, reconcile.

Your ire shouldn't be directed at the everyday Republican voter - it should be at the people who exploit them. There's a huge difference between those two things. The vast majority of an electorate aren't the ones invading the Capitol; they're moderate who lean one way or another based on their personal circumstances.

It's not about being "gentle"; it's about being smart.
I keep banging on this and I keep getting no response. How do you fix an issue of an uneducated populace when the people in charge of these states make sure it stays uneducated? It's circular reasoing here. "make them smarter" "they don't want to be smarter and the state doesn't want them to be" "so make them smarter"

How do you fix the issue of an uneducated populace when they are PROUD to be uneducated?

How fo you fix the issue of an uneducated populace that votes against making their lives better when they routinely vote against their own interests?


Honestly, I know a lot of these people and they aren't stupid. They are just completely blind to anyone elses point of view.

The best idea I have is to just let them whine and complain and just make their lives better without listening to them. They don't like nationalized health care? Don't care, it still helps them. They don't like expanding benefits for them when they lose their jobs? Don't care, it still helps them.

You really just don't seem to get the US in 2021: They don't care what you do, they're going to hate it regardless.
 
I keep banging on this and I keep getting no response. How do you fix an issue of an uneducated populace when the people in charge of these states make sure it stays uneducated? It's circular reasoing here. "make them smarter" "they don't want to be smarter and the state doesn't want them to be" "so make them smarter"

How do you fix the issue of an uneducated populace when they are PROUD to be uneducated?

How fo you fix the issue of an uneducated populace that votes against making their lives better when they routinely vote against their own interests?


Honestly, I know a lot of these people and they aren't stupid. They are just completely blind to anyone elses point of view.

The best idea I have is to just let them whine and complain and just make their lives better without listening to them. They don't like nationalized health care? Don't care, it still helps them. They don't like expanding benefits for them when they lose their jobs? Don't care, it still helps them.

You really just don't seem to get the US in 2021: They don't care what you do, they're going to hate it regardless.

I'm not after a magic switch that fixes the US in 2021.

I'm after a solution that fixes the US by 2036. And even then not totally into some sort of utopia.

I'd just ask what you think what you're calling for would result in? Say Biden went full on left wing, a Bernie Sanders wet dream if you will, and did everything that "needed" doing in the next 12 months. What would that mean long term for the US?

For me, I think that unintentionally forments a possible civil war in a few years, because of how the political landscape is.

EDIT:

Just to add.

They don't like nationalized health care? Don't care, it still helps them. They don't like expanding benefits for them when they lose their jobs? Don't care, it still helps them.

They're good things; just do them over the space of a decade. Obamacare was a flagship policy, a half measure towards future gains in the same sector. Take the inch now, take the mile later.
 
I'm not after a magic switch that fixes the US in 2021.

I'm after a solution that fixes the US by 2036. And even then not totally into some sort of utopia.

I'd just ask what you think what you're calling for would result in? Say Biden went full on left wing, a Bernie Sanders wet dream if you will, and did everything that "needed" doing in the next 12 months. What would that mean long term for the US?

For me, I think that unintentionally forments a possible civil war in a few years, because of how the political landscape is.

EDIT:

Just to add.



They're good things; just do them over the space of a decade. Obamacare was a flagship policy, a half measure towards future gains in the same sector. Take the inch now, take the mile later.
So Biden should just ditch his promises to his 81 million voters in the hopes he doesn’t antagonize the 74 the coted for Trump?

A lot of them are fairly moderate but his plan for climate for instance is pretty left wing.
 
So Biden should just ditch his promises to his 81 million voters in the hopes he doesn’t antagonize the 74 the coted for Trump?

A lot of them are fairly moderate but his plan for climate for instance is pretty left wing.

No, he should pick and choose his battles.

Obamacare is the perfect example of what I mean.

When introduced, it wasn't full on NHS, because that would have been intolerable at the time. But it was enough to cause, er... a bit of rage to say the least. Obama sunk quite a lot of political capital into it.

Over time, repeals failed, by the time Trump got in office Obamacare was ingrained enough to be indispensible. The roots had taken hold.

Now, in 2021, people have used it, saw the benefits, and it's not even an electoral issue. It's actually increasingly popular. Biden can now expand on it.


It took a decade, but it's lasting, pretty much irreversible positive change. That's what I mean by incremental gains. Obama didn't go for the home run; he stopped at third base and waited for someone else to convert the big score later.

With climate change, it's honestly not the hot button topic you'd think it'd be in terms of controversy. There'd be some backlash sure, but it's an ever decreasing minority who deny it needs addressing and the actual impact of it won't be felt on daily lives in a visceral way. There's so many other issues right now that Biden rejoining the Paris Accords on Day 1 won't result in many eyelids batted IMO, bar from the usual airwaves shock jocks pronouncing American immediate doom etc. but that'd happen if Biden does anything.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.

🛒 Visit Shop

Support Grand Old Team by checking out our latest Everton gear!
Back
Top