Current Affairs Stabbing incident in Southport

[efcste97]

Few things.

Your post, and that X post has nothing to do whatsoever with this thread.

You're not going to be banned or fumed at for sharing content from an account others don't like. You can share, and make comment.

You're not asking a very specific question relating to media within his post.

Ban me if you want, got 0 idea how it's a bannable offence but go ahead. Have you got a problem with me pointing out a dreadful reply to a man that's been racially attacked?

Last time I checked others have been posting videos from Hartlepool etc in this thread because they're directly related to the protests that took place in Southport

 

[bluerobert]

The police actually did their job and where rewarded with 50+ injured police and a few burnt down vans, all because they thought this fella was muslim when he was actually one of their own.

The old Peasful protest

 

[GrandOldTeam]

Ban me if you want, got 0 idea how it's a bannable offence but go ahead. Have you got a problem with me pointing out a dreadful reply to a man that's been racially attacked?

Last time I checked others have been posting videos from Hartlepool etc in this thread because they're directly related to the protests that took place in Southport

Why would I have a problem with you pointing out a dreadful reply? What are you insinuating? Be brave mate.

I think the problem is with your comprehension.

You've had a pop about me sharing a post from an account - a post which asked a specific question about the location of a video, in response to another question.

Yet, you post his stuff - presumably to have a dig "lovely fella and should def be used as a source...."

Which your entitled to do but evidently, the irony of you having a platform here to do just that, is lost on you.

 

[Sean Ashley]

You only let these thugs who have been causing havoc win, if we start arguing with each other.


Talking about brave here are the community officers who with the rest of the police would have seen and dealt with more than anyone can imagine this week. Here out to show their respect.

 

[tsubaki]

The Met also provided a breakdown of the arrests:

• 1x possession of offensive weapons
• 27x failing to comply with conditions applied to the protest - Section 14 Public Order Act 1986
• 16x violent disorder
• 2x assault on emergency worker
• 2x racially/religiously aggravated offences causing fear of violence
• 1x unlawful possession of Class A drugs
• 2x breach of dispersal order

A further 60 people were arrested for failing to comply with conditions on the protest under Section 14 Public Order Act 1986.

They were not taken into custody, but "remain under investigation".



A lot of doors getting knocked on soon.

“Remain under investigation” doesn’t mean they weren’t taken into custody, it usually means they were but have been bailed to come back to the station.

 

[efcste97]

Why would I have a problem with you pointing out a dreadful reply? What are you insinuating? Be brave mate.

I think the problem is with your comprehension.

You've had a pop about me sharing a post from an account - a post which asked a specific question about the location of a video, in response to another question.

Yet, you post his stuff - presumably to have a dig "lovely fella and should def be used as a source...."

Which your entitled to do but evidently, the irony of you having a platform here to do just that, is lost on you.

You stated that 'Your post, and that X post has nothing to do whatsoever with this thread' Is that true?

 

[grandjoeblue]

Looks like they're trying to plan a similar 'protest' at a mosque in Liverpool on Friday.

More needs to be done to stop these planned riots from happening.

 

[GrandOldTeam]

You stated that 'Your post, and that X post has nothing to do whatsoever with this thread' Is that true?

I think you're either being a WUM, deliberately obtuse or just not the brightest bulb in the box.

The point is - and it's a simple one. If we stopped people posting content from some accounts as you advocated - you'd be unable to do what you're doing. It's not always about the source and their reliability - context.

Enjoy being able to cite/reference any source you like from X and beyond in Current Affairs without fear of reprisal. As it should be.

 

[efcste97]

I think you're either being a WUM, deliberately obtuse or just not the brightest bulb in the box.

The point is - and it's a simple one. If we stopped people posting content from some accounts as you advocated - you'd be unable to do what you're doing. It's not always about the source and their reliability - context.

Enjoy being able to cite/reference any source you like from X and beyond in Current Affairs without fear of reprisal. As it should be.

Show me where I advocated for that? Stop insulting me also please.

 

[Bruce Wayne]

Show me where I advocated for that? Stop insulting me also please.

Can one of you just throw a brick at the other?

 

[GrandOldTeam]

Show me where I advocated for that? Stop insulting me also please.

I think you are either on a wind up/being obtuse (at worst), or struggle with comprehension (at best). If you think that's insulting, you'll need to take it on the chin.

To answer your question - here's you believing my post which cited one X account you didn't like to be;

Proper embarrassing

The doubling down was very strange. After admitting he didn't know much about the source and being informed by others about its nature, he responded with, "I'll post what I want.".

Relax? I'm stating a fact. The source he used is a horrible human, the first time he posted it was fine, but why re-post it?

I don't really think I've been over emotional tbh, I've stated I was fine with you originally posting the tweet, just thought it was strange of you to re-post it cos at the end of the day, 'ben' is a POS who'll comment anything to get engagements.

It all come down to context, if someone was posting Lennons tweets agreeing with him etc then I would question that persons beliefs. Your first post was fine, i can understand why you got annoyed over the machete/knife argument tbf

So you decided I shouldn't post from that account. Then your issue was because I requoted my post.

But since, you've posted the same account repeatedly;

I'm posting to point out how ridiculous this guy is. ZERO evidence that these were protesting yesterday

ben defending a innocent fella getting punched, lovely fella and should def be used as a source....

 

[Milkman]

Heartening images of the clean up efforts at the Mosque in S’port today.
View attachment 267170

Isn't it amazing that these are the same lads that smashed the place up the other night?

 

[Bruce Wayne]

Isn't it amazing that these are the same lads that smashed the place up the other night?

Maybe a brick to the head helped them come to their senses?

 

[Shevin Keedy]

Something tells me the details that have been released about his identity and the picture aren't going to quell a lot of these protests.

Call it a hunch.

 

[Willie Thorne]

With regards to the protests over the last couple of weeks. I feel the elastic band has finally snapped..

Expect more.