- Status
Kever10
Player Valuation: £25m
Which is why the questions are loaded as they are...
Its not like there is any way to sway it...
What do you prefer, rank your favourites of the following:
6
Six
VI
Half a dozen
2x3
Ok, lets see if this works. I had to take a (crap) picture of this so I could upload it. Im a massive fan of Borussia Dortmund, and love the simplicity of their badge, quite obviously my first two efforts here are similar. Thoughts?
Like this one to be fair
Rupert's Tower
Player Valuation: £6m
Ok, lets see if this works. I had to take a (crap) picture of this so I could upload it. Im a massive fan of Borussia Dortmund, and love the simplicity of their badge, quite obviously my first two efforts here are similar. Thoughts?
Also, the actual crest vote will be only open to people with customer numbers which will stop windups voting for rubbish ones.
icburns
pyar sauced
That's sound. They'll have to just trim the results of this first round as is usually standard with this kind of survey (as I understand it).
That's so hard--do I have to rank them 1 to 5? It'd be so much easier if I could vote x/10 instead of using radio buttons.
I'm ready to be negged, but I like the questionnaire and think it's a good idea. There are a lot of wonderful designs here, but few of them are more useful than uploading to FIFA. Most are too busy to be more than concepts, and while I understand that many teams have a busy crest, few are revising their club brand to become more busy. The old crest was too busy; too many colors, too many details. The club should preserve all of these details, but not in one place.
I expect the club will preserve all of these details, but not all on the new badge. It seems clear to me that they're putting up the name, the tower, and one element. I presume they'd like to keep the badge shape because it's uncommon for top-flight teams. Who use it besides Everton and Barcelona? They may be more open to change, but I suspect not. I can't see the wreaths staying, except in a more abstract form. The questionnaire is helpful for determining what the supporters value, it's helpful for "educating" (or leading as others have suggested) supporters on brand values, and it's helpful for the club to build the PR strategy for the new crest/badge. I don't have a problem with this (although I also find the new badge acceptable, even if I would prefer it only in blue/white).
I expect the club will preserve all of these details, but not all on the new badge. It seems clear to me that they're putting up the name, the tower, and one element. I presume they'd like to keep the badge shape because it's uncommon for top-flight teams. Who use it besides Everton and Barcelona? They may be more open to change, but I suspect not. I can't see the wreaths staying, except in a more abstract form. The questionnaire is helpful for determining what the supporters value, it's helpful for "educating" (or leading as others have suggested) supporters on brand values, and it's helpful for the club to build the PR strategy for the new crest/badge. I don't have a problem with this (although I also find the new badge acceptable, even if I would prefer it only in blue/white).
spot on mate with the last couple of lines regarding tower, laurels and nil satis nisi optimum and all that inside the shield please.
uknightbreed
Player Valuation: £35m
inspired by the bee hive on the new badge and tony hibbert tackling a kopite.
eigh
Player Valuation: £225k
Agreed!
radiostar
Player Valuation: £20m
Go for the simple look. Why not just the tower and EFC underneath? Save all NSNO and formation dates etc for the full badge. Quite like the modern yet retro look of Tottenhams crest so thats what im thinking of with this. Having a shield etc makes it too cluttered IMO, everyone knows what "EFC" stands for, its probabaly one of the most famous football initials in the world.
Jayhow15
Player Valuation: £35m
Sorry mate, Im not loving them, too much going on for me. Lose the Everton as we know who we are and maybe the 1878 on the tower.
- Status
