Thank you for this response,
Well, thank you for your response. A lot better than the usual snide comment that doesn’t contribute anything to the debate (Normally in the form of one sentence).
you have just confirmed to me exactly what you are. This type of response is the modus operandi with people of your ilk who hold these types of objectionable views. I've crossed paths with hundreds of you over the years.
Well thank you. My “modus operandi” when discussing politics is actually talking about real information. Rather than solely attacking others. Although you spelled "Objective" wrong.
Objective:
Not influenced by feelings or opinion and representing facts.
You see, what you are doing is disguising your rhetoric as well researched opinion, hoping people will come in and debate you so that you can keep your little platform going in which to spew your bile and build an audience. You'll never make any of your points or say any of your beliefs directly, but disguise them as other peoples in the form of quotes and links.
The reason I started producing links to actual peer reviewed studies and official statistics from the U.S government. Is because others produced links from the likes of the Washington Post and Huffington post to back up their “claims”.
You see the difference is that I actually read peer reviewed studies and produce an opinion of my own, looks like you've ignored the links I provided, otherwise you wouldn't have wrote what you just did.
I'd rather do that, than be lazy and regurgitate left-leaning (or right-leaning) opinion based biased new’s articles and vomit them out over this echo chamber.
I have no interest of building a platform on here, I have said my views directly. I've been here for years. I'd rather talk about Everton personally. It is amazing though how I simply started on here by disputing a comment. You think I'm trying to build an audience because you know so much about me. Deary me. So much projecting going on here.
And then when people call you out, you go crying about 'civilized debate' and go on about 'critical thinking' (a tactic to undermine the person who is calling you out for what you are) in this case, me.
I see right through you, clear as day.
Attacking people for the information they provide is not "calling someone out". Using this tactic rather than disputing the information itself, is not only unreasonable, but also foolish and childish. All it tells me is that you have NOTHING.
Attack, make accusations, attack, make snide comments *rinse and repeat*
And then you have the nerve to call my rhetoric disgusting?
So, rather than making one sentence attacking me rather than the information. You just made a few paragraphs attacking me rather than the information.
Pathetic.