Like most experts hes probably wrong over Brexit as we have not gone immediately into recession as forecast the DP pointed Osbornes script out yesterday on the DP!
end of the day the final figure net foir our membership of the EU is 8.5 billion net and will be rising in a club with ZERO GROWTH!Actually even less. It was £18bn per year (£350m), minus £5bn instant rebate and £4bn in EU payments to the UK. So it was closer to £175-200m.
How is pissing £8,372,000,000 per year a great return.
I will accept your argument if you can show ACTUAL figures to support the figure you quote as benefiting our GDP per year (and I note you use the word 'estimated'...) against a figure or NOT being in the EU and how our GDP is affected then (with you giving the full scenario of how our trade post-Brexit with the rest of the world has adversely/positively affected the UK's GDP).
You see, you are working only on hypotheses and opinions. You cannot ground facts on hypotheses and opinions. 'He who asserts must prove' is a legal tenet which applies to many things in life. Your points in this discussion are assertions without any proof, and are therefore fatally flawed.
We are NOT paying a tenner to get back fifty quid. We are giving the EU a tenner and they are saying, 'Thank you very much', and sticking it in their back pocket.
end of the day the final figure net foir our membership of the EU is 8.5 billion net and will be rising in a club with ZERO GROWTH!
How is the EU some how gives us good growth in your opinion yet the rest of it apart form Germany is on its knees??????????????OK, let's pretend we pay £18bn a year to the EU. We don't, but that's the upper scale.
The CBI estimates that the net benefit of EU membership is worth 4-5% of GDP to the UK, or £62bn-£78bn per year.
It's really that simple. Leaving the EU doesn't have an economic argument that holds any water whatsoever.
We really, really need a sarcasm/irony font on here.
not quite apples Vs apples; Tubey was saying/inferring - ALL experts are right as the clue is in the name and the world is full of Idiots...but only if they don't believe 'The Experts' 100%. I hoped the contrary view in it's similar silliness might tweak a sensible brain cell or two
#pearls before swine
On Doctors; they're just like mechanics... but body mechanics; and there are 'good' and 'not so good' (and also cheap and not so cheap)
One shows me a blocked fuel pump or a scan of a blocked heart artery and I ask when can you do it, then how much.
With both I've found two who know what they're at and don't over charge you and/or set you up for stuff you don't need just for the sake of it...and both insist I come in for regular servicing/checks.
face facts your blowing in the wind we voted OUT!Do you actually know what the bold word means?
How is the EU some how gives us good growth in your opinion yet the rest of it apart form Germany is on its knees??????????????
Who's to say we would not flourish and do well in world trade even better that's why the out won the vote get used to it!
Because it's such a fundamental part of our economy that cutting it away would be such a substantial hit that replacing it in the short- to medium-term is outright impossible, and even in the long-term it is extremely likely to be damaging.
It's not just me saying it - it's actually backed by people whose jobs rely on actually looking properly at these kinds of things.
Given the importance of this referendum we feel we need to reiterate that the CEP, the IFS and NIESR are all independent, impartial organisations which exist to conduct and promote high quality economic research. What we publish and say is not, and never has been, influenced by our funding. None of our funding is dependent on being either pro-EU or pro-government – as our frequent vocal criticisms of each in the past should make clear. None of the three current directors of the organisations ever supported joining the Euro, nor did the organisations themselves.
Jagjit Chadha, director of NIESR said: “Our research shows that in the short run a vote to leave the EU would increase uncertainty and, at best, reduce growth. In the long run more costly trade and less foreign investment would hold growth back.”
John van Reenen, director of the CEP said: “Research at both CEP and NIESR shows that the UK economy would do worse outside the EU than in it. Trade as an engine of growth would stall. Indeed virtually all the economic work of which we are aware tells the same story – there really is no serious doubt that leaving would be taking a big risk with the economy.”
Paul Johnson, director of IFS said: “Given that leaving the EU is likely to reduce growth the public finances would suffer. That would mean higher borrowing in the short term and higher taxes or lower spending in the long-term.”
https://fullfact.org/europe/economic-consequences-leaving-eu/
Let's just say hypothetically that it was economically better for Britain to become a state in the United States of America, would you vote for our country to become a state?
Let's just say it was economically better for New Zealand to join Australia and sacrifice sovereignty, should they do it?
Was it really an economic question to most?
Let's just say hypothetically that it was economically better for Britain to become a state in the United States of America, would you vote for our country to become a state?
Let's just say it was economically better for New Zealand to join Australia and sacrifice sovereignty, should they do it?
Was it really an economic question to most?
Google away all you want brexit will happen we will leave the EU is some capacity were we get our laws back - how ironicle Canada has been given a free rade agreement yet immigration in their country from all over the world a single person cannot enter to live there? on LBC this amBecause it's such a fundamental part of our economy that cutting it away would be such a substantial hit that replacing it in the short- to medium-term is outright impossible, and even in the long-term it is extremely likely to be damaging.
It's not just me saying it - it's actually backed by people whose jobs rely on actually looking properly at these kinds of things.
Given the importance of this referendum we feel we need to reiterate that the CEP, the IFS and NIESR are all independent, impartial organisations which exist to conduct and promote high quality economic research. What we publish and say is not, and never has been, influenced by our funding. None of our funding is dependent on being either pro-EU or pro-government – as our frequent vocal criticisms of each in the past should make clear. None of the three current directors of the organisations ever supported joining the Euro, nor did the organisations themselves.
Jagjit Chadha, director of NIESR said: “Our research shows that in the short run a vote to leave the EU would increase uncertainty and, at best, reduce growth. In the long run more costly trade and less foreign investment would hold growth back.”
John van Reenen, director of the CEP said: “Research at both CEP and NIESR shows that the UK economy would do worse outside the EU than in it. Trade as an engine of growth would stall. Indeed virtually all the economic work of which we are aware tells the same story – there really is no serious doubt that leaving would be taking a big risk with the economy.”
Paul Johnson, director of IFS said: “Given that leaving the EU is likely to reduce growth the public finances would suffer. That would mean higher borrowing in the short term and higher taxes or lower spending in the long-term.”
https://fullfact.org/europe/economic-consequences-leaving-eu/
Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.