Current Affairs EU In or Out

In or Out

  • In

    Votes: 688 67.9%
  • Out

    Votes: 325 32.1%

  • Total voters
    1,013
Status
Not open for further replies.
How is pissing £8,372,000,000 per year a great return.

I will accept your argument if you can show ACTUAL figures to support the figure you quote as benefiting our GDP per year (and I note you use the word 'estimated'...) against a figure or NOT being in the EU and how our GDP is affected then (with you giving the full scenario of how our trade post-Brexit with the rest of the world has adversely/positively affected the UK's GDP).

You see, you are working only on hypotheses and opinions. You cannot ground facts on hypotheses and opinions. 'He who asserts must prove' is a legal tenet which applies to many things in life. Your points in this discussion are assertions without any proof, and are therefore fatally flawed.

We are NOT paying a tenner to get back fifty quid. We are giving the EU a tenner and they are saying, 'Thank you very much', and sticking it in their back pocket.

So, essentially, you're not interested in anything any expert says.

Let me put it this way - I'll take what the CBI and pretty much any notable professional body on the subject matter say after many, many studies more seriously than one crackpot on GOT.

I still value people having expertise on a subject to form my own views. You clearly don't. So be it. But at this point, if you really think we're "pissing" £8bn away with it going in the EU's "back pocket" with nothing in return, you're deluded and akin to someone denying climate change based on a "gut feeling".
 
OK, let's pretend we pay £18bn a year to the EU. We don't, but that's the upper scale.

The CBI estimates that the net benefit of EU membership is worth 4-5% of GDP to the UK, or £62bn-£78bn per year.

It's really that simple. Leaving the EU doesn't have an economic argument that holds any water whatsoever.
How is the EU some how gives us good growth in your opinion yet the rest of it apart form Germany is on its knees??????????????
Who's to say we would not flourish and do well in world trade even better that's why the out won the vote get used to it!
 
We really, really need a sarcasm/irony font on here.

not quite apples Vs apples; Tubey was saying/inferring - ALL experts are right as the clue is in the name and the world is full of Idiots...but only if they don't believe 'The Experts' 100%. I hoped the contrary view in it's similar silliness might tweak a sensible brain cell or two
#pearls before swine

On Doctors; they're just like mechanics... but body mechanics; and there are 'good' and 'not so good' (and also cheap and not so cheap)

One shows me a blocked fuel pump or a scan of a blocked heart artery and I ask when can you do it, then how much.
With both I've found two who know what they're at and don't over charge you and/or set you up for stuff you don't need just for the sake of it...and both insist I come in for regular servicing/checks.

For the love of...

That's NOT what I'm saying. I'm saying you have to at least put emphasis on something being carefully thought through, when set against some idiots just shouting stuff in the ether loud enough to be convincing to the average Joe Public.
 
How is the EU some how gives us good growth in your opinion yet the rest of it apart form Germany is on its knees??????????????
Who's to say we would not flourish and do well in world trade even better that's why the out won the vote get used to it!

Because it's such a fundamental part of our economy that cutting it away would be such a substantial hit that replacing it in the short- to medium-term is outright impossible, and even in the long-term it is extremely likely to be damaging.

It's not just me saying it - it's actually backed by people whose jobs rely on actually looking properly at these kinds of things.

Given the importance of this referendum we feel we need to reiterate that the CEP, the IFS and NIESR are all independent, impartial organisations which exist to conduct and promote high quality economic research. What we publish and say is not, and never has been, influenced by our funding. None of our funding is dependent on being either pro-EU or pro-government – as our frequent vocal criticisms of each in the past should make clear. None of the three current directors of the organisations ever supported joining the Euro, nor did the organisations themselves.

Jagjit Chadha, director of NIESR said: “Our research shows that in the short run a vote to leave the EU would increase uncertainty and, at best, reduce growth. In the long run more costly trade and less foreign investment would hold growth back.”

John van Reenen, director of the CEP said: “Research at both CEP and NIESR shows that the UK economy would do worse outside the EU than in it. Trade as an engine of growth would stall. Indeed virtually all the economic work of which we are aware tells the same story – there really is no serious doubt that leaving would be taking a big risk with the economy.”

Paul Johnson, director of IFS said: “Given that leaving the EU is likely to reduce growth the public finances would suffer. That would mean higher borrowing in the short term and higher taxes or lower spending in the long-term.”

https://fullfact.org/europe/economic-consequences-leaving-eu/
 
Let's just say hypothetically that it was economically better for Britain to become a state in the United States of America, would you vote for our country to become a state?

Let's just say it was economically better for New Zealand to join Australia and sacrifice sovereignty, should they do it?

Was it really an economic question to most?
 
Because it's such a fundamental part of our economy that cutting it away would be such a substantial hit that replacing it in the short- to medium-term is outright impossible, and even in the long-term it is extremely likely to be damaging.

It's not just me saying it - it's actually backed by people whose jobs rely on actually looking properly at these kinds of things.

Given the importance of this referendum we feel we need to reiterate that the CEP, the IFS and NIESR are all independent, impartial organisations which exist to conduct and promote high quality economic research. What we publish and say is not, and never has been, influenced by our funding. None of our funding is dependent on being either pro-EU or pro-government – as our frequent vocal criticisms of each in the past should make clear. None of the three current directors of the organisations ever supported joining the Euro, nor did the organisations themselves.

Jagjit Chadha, director of NIESR said: “Our research shows that in the short run a vote to leave the EU would increase uncertainty and, at best, reduce growth. In the long run more costly trade and less foreign investment would hold growth back.”

John van Reenen, director of the CEP said: “Research at both CEP and NIESR shows that the UK economy would do worse outside the EU than in it. Trade as an engine of growth would stall. Indeed virtually all the economic work of which we are aware tells the same story – there really is no serious doubt that leaving would be taking a big risk with the economy.”

Paul Johnson, director of IFS said: “Given that leaving the EU is likely to reduce growth the public finances would suffer. That would mean higher borrowing in the short term and higher taxes or lower spending in the long-term.”

https://fullfact.org/europe/economic-consequences-leaving-eu/

Johnson and Chadha are ex Treasury employees, and van Reenen was a SPAD to New Labour for a short while. It should not be automatically presumed that they are entirely independent figures making an honest assessment of the pros and cons of a measure.
 
The Office for National Statistics (ONS) said sales volumes in October were up 7.4% from a year earlier.
On a monthly basis, sales jumped 1.9% from September - a much stronger increase than economists had forecast.
October's autumnal conditions boosted clothing sales.
Paul Hollingsworth, UK economist at Capital Economics, said: "Clothing sales in particular were strong, perhaps reflecting the cooler weather prompting a re-stocking of consumers' winter wardrobes."
The ONS also said that internet sales posted the strongest growth for five years, jumping almost 27%.
"Non-store sales have surged over the last months, rising by 4.1% in September and 3.6% in October, showing no weakening in the trend away from spending on the high street to online shopping," said Samuel Tombs at Pantheon Macroeconomics.
The figures suggest consumer confidence remains robust in the face of uncertainty caused by Brexit.
 
Let's just say hypothetically that it was economically better for Britain to become a state in the United States of America, would you vote for our country to become a state?

Let's just say it was economically better for New Zealand to join Australia and sacrifice sovereignty, should they do it?

Was it really an economic question to most?

I think that's the core question. We voted for trade not a USE, we very nearly got sucked into it........
 
Let's just say hypothetically that it was economically better for Britain to become a state in the United States of America, would you vote for our country to become a state?

Let's just say it was economically better for New Zealand to join Australia and sacrifice sovereignty, should they do it?

Was it really an economic question to most?

Indeed, and that's what people should be honest about - instead of arguing about Britain being "better off", just call it what it is - you want out of the EU as you dislike the idea of any form of foreign sovereignty over our country, no matter how insignificant it is, and consider total and complete independence more important than potential financial ruin.

And that's fine. You're entitled to that view, but don't pretend you are coming to that conclusion based on any research whatsoever about what is best overall for the wellbeing of the UK, because you are obviously not. You are doing it based on gut instinct.
 
Because it's such a fundamental part of our economy that cutting it away would be such a substantial hit that replacing it in the short- to medium-term is outright impossible, and even in the long-term it is extremely likely to be damaging.

It's not just me saying it - it's actually backed by people whose jobs rely on actually looking properly at these kinds of things.

Given the importance of this referendum we feel we need to reiterate that the CEP, the IFS and NIESR are all independent, impartial organisations which exist to conduct and promote high quality economic research. What we publish and say is not, and never has been, influenced by our funding. None of our funding is dependent on being either pro-EU or pro-government – as our frequent vocal criticisms of each in the past should make clear. None of the three current directors of the organisations ever supported joining the Euro, nor did the organisations themselves.

Jagjit Chadha, director of NIESR said: “Our research shows that in the short run a vote to leave the EU would increase uncertainty and, at best, reduce growth. In the long run more costly trade and less foreign investment would hold growth back.”

John van Reenen, director of the CEP said: “Research at both CEP and NIESR shows that the UK economy would do worse outside the EU than in it. Trade as an engine of growth would stall. Indeed virtually all the economic work of which we are aware tells the same story – there really is no serious doubt that leaving would be taking a big risk with the economy.”

Paul Johnson, director of IFS said: “Given that leaving the EU is likely to reduce growth the public finances would suffer. That would mean higher borrowing in the short term and higher taxes or lower spending in the long-term.”

https://fullfact.org/europe/economic-consequences-leaving-eu/
Google away all you want brexit will happen we will leave the EU is some capacity were we get our laws back - how ironicle Canada has been given a free rade agreement yet immigration in their country from all over the world a single person cannot enter to live there? on LBC this am
Just look at their rules on just going there as a tourist -

http://www.cic.gc.ca/english/visit/apply-who.asp

The EU is becoming defunct its debts are rising who in their right mind would want to be in a political union with that lot - trade as we first voted on yes the treaty's NO
We are a big economy we have no need to subsidise the lesser eastern block countries who contribute next to nothing other than benefit from the EU Brexit means Brexit - learn to live with it!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.

🛒 Visit Shop

Support Grand Old Team by checking out our latest Everton gear!
Back
Top