Current Affairs EU In or Out

In or Out

  • In

    Votes: 688 67.9%
  • Out

    Votes: 325 32.1%

  • Total voters
    1,013
Status
Not open for further replies.
Well yes, but saying 'Sovereignty' and citing legal cases about the nature of sovereignty normally implies that you understand the difference in how sovereignty can be gained or ceeded in law. I've talked about it before in this thread and it's largely been ignored, but it's not as simple as 'i lose my power' when talking about sovereignty and supranational institutions because as part of that institution we also gain sovereignty over the laws of other member states through our influence in the various governance mechanisms of the EU.

Please elaborate. I doubt people have ignored what you talked about before, probably just overlooked it due to some of the noise that appears in here.

The part in bold that drew my attention for sure, so in giving up some self determining power (for want of a better description), then we in turn gain that power elsewhere over other nation states ? Do I have that right ?
 
Please elaborate. I doubt people have ignored what you talked about before, probably just overlooked it due to some of the noise that appears in here.

The part in bold that drew my attention for sure, so in giving up some self determining power (for want of a better description), then we in turn gain that power elsewhere over other nation states ? Do I have that right ?
It's an odd debate if you apply sovereignty to the decision to Leave. In essence, you split the concept into two domains de jure and de facto.

You can knowingly reduce your de facto autonomy if you willingly enter into beneficial arrangements that supersede de jure sovereignty. There's nothing adverse about that, it's a decision taken in best interests, which effectively become a cooperate accord.

While you can say with certainty that the EU does have an input into UK laws and legislation and you may be right in asserting that EU regulation is excessive, undermining the de jure sovereignty of the UK, the fact that we are in a collective Union and able to influence decisions and legislation on a wider platform than our own state, we've actually increased our de facto sovereignty. You also can't argue that we weren't involved in the shaping of those regulations.

However, under May's deal we effectively reduce our sovereignty in both de facto and de jure basis.
Basically that. Nothing different about Johnson's deal to Mays other than PR, so that point effectively still applies as well
 
simplify it for me.

Are you saying we actually increase our powers by entering into an arrangement whereby we allow others to influence our laws but in turn we influence theirs ?
 
It makes for a more intelligent conversation. Just look at the guff you see in here. Did you also note that having repeated the question, not one single EU supporter actually answered it......

I answered it with a link to full details about every project funded in Luxembourg, so you have the power to answer it yourself. Of course, you don't really want to answer it, as that would require doing some work to question your assumptions.
 
It makes for a more intelligent conversation. Just look at the guff you see in here. Did you also note that having repeated the question, not one single EU supporter actually answered it......

This what I dont think leavers get about many remainers; I dont support the EU, and I think a lot of the grief they get is valid. The accounts for one.

But on balance, the arrangement we have, or had, within the EU was mutually a good one. On balance. Not perfect, but what is?

Why I voted to remain was pretty much cos of that, plus, I didnt buy the codswallop that was spouted by some pretty awful people.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.

🛒 Visit Shop

Support Grand Old Team by checking out our latest Everton gear!
Back
Top