I mean, to me 2 significant upgrades to your starting XI is a significant upgrade to your squad, even ignoring the fact that you’d say spending another £100m should also mean the wider squad has improved. The context here is increased expectations from thinking we should be aiming for 11th or 12th to thinking we should be aiming for 8th-10th, nobody’s claiming we’ve got the best squad in the world and have improved in every single position, that’s just a weird straw man argument being thrown about to try to help a pretty ropey argument.
That's a bit of a false equivalence isn't it. Didn't we lose more players than we brought in in total? 16 out, 9 in? re increased expectations, well,
Moyes delivered. Dyche wasn't being obeyed by the players and he'd gone as far as he could and so DM got the run and produced some much improved stuff. Anyone expecting the same or similar improvements to that initial change - well, that's entirely on them. There are no guarantees in football, and the set up change re J O'B could only pay off so far. Add to that a major difference of play from the Doucoure marathon press game we had to the more football pass and move stuff we've tried to implement. Where once we relied on 3 or 4 loans to be starting for us (Mangala, Lindstrom, Harrison, Broja) and a couple of veterans (Young, Gana) we've come quite a long way in a very short time whilst trying to improve on the spectacle AND the results.
Not many sides made such wholesale changes as we have over the summer, and trying to bed all those new players in takes time, training and experience. (a couple of extra games in the LC would have helped a lot here!)
And then there's everyone else, few saw Sunderland being such straight out of the blocks league high fliers, they took a punt on some new faces and got cooking quickly. Good for them. Slowly the novelty difference wears off.
Q. Is the outlook night and day compared to the last hours of the Dyche regime?
Q. How much more improvement would have satisfied you than has been delivered so far?