Where's the lie? They're your own words.
Short-term, as opposed to long-term, is by definition a
smaller deal...You blankly stated the vaccine side-effect of myocarditis is
not long term,
it's short term. hence
no big deal is a fair interpretation of your post.
McCullough disagrees. Interestingly, the infamous 'fact-checkers' say the same thing you do when refuting McCullough:
"short-term outcomes of myocarditis after COVID-19 vaccine are much better than those of typical viral myocarditis."
i.e.
no big deal.
It's useful for on-the-fence young folk to both look at what McCullough is saying (via, for example, the
Rogan podcast), and also look at what you're saying. Then decide for themselves if a booster with
reduced & shorter effectiveness for what is by most accounts an average cold is worth it.
Hence...why I post what I post. I think there's at least ten times more non-active readers than posters/likers. Some info might be useful.