And...once again...I've also linked to New York Times, Guardian and dozens of sources you would find more ideologically agreeable.
Just look at the posts from the last 24 hours that you have posted. There was one yesterday which was a list of 11 Toby Young tweets.
It’s not about things being ideologically agreeable it’s about whether what you are posting is from proven liars.
I quoted an actual line from the piece, which is derived from the actual headline. Of course the whole piece is more detailed...that's why I linked it so people can read the whole thing and make their own mind up.
Another example of your complete inability to self reflect. You’ve posted a piece you’ve probably not read that is behind a paywall, for people to be able to ‘make their own mind up’. How the hell can people make their own mind up when they can’t read it?
I guess you liked the headline though.
The piece is indicative of a general mainstream trend away from blind acceptance of the boosters. That's what I was highlighting.
I see zero mainstream trend of this. You’ve just made this up. The piece is about 4th jabs a subject not really started in the uk.
If you're afraid of open debate of complex issues...then just don't take part. Don't attempt to shut it down just because you don't like it.
I’m not afraid of open debate. What annoys me is people actively discouraging people in getting the vaccine.
This is what you are doing, you may not agree but you are.
I genuinely believe (like the vast, vast most of scientific research does) that the vaccines are the best way of getting out of the horrors of the lockdowns of the last two years.
A hallmark of fascism is the suppression of opposition...we don't really want to go there.
A hallmark of a poor argument is calling someone a Nazi.
This is worrying...are you ok? I mean, where do you get that idea? I've literally linked & quoted almost all the major MSM outlets during my posts on this thread, backing up my arguments.
It's like yous (the mob) are creating a caricature, then arguing against that caricature. Maybe it's easier to do that then argue my actual posts?
I’m not sure if you are genuine or not here. Just look at what you are posting. From the last three days I’ve got Youngs tweets, the daily sceptic and a US Website called the citizens journal. This is what media fact check says about that:
The Citizens Journal:
Far-Right Biased and Questionable based on the promotion of pseudoscience, conspiracy theories, the use of poor sources, and failed fact checks.