What will have changed?
We’re already on 3 jabs in less than a year if you get your booster. It’s not new
Yes we do, name your nearest Morrison’s car park mate (masks optional)![]()
Not legally enforced and the venues don't actually do it. There's no justification whatsoever for a mask mandate that leaves out hospitality - it's a half measure. Completely pointless.
Why do you need to be told by anyone that a decent thing to do is a good idea? Masks dont protect you alone, they protect other folk. But hey, high horse.
I've said repeatedly I'll still wear masks in crowded spaces, not because I need to be told to, but because I'm not an arsehole.
People shouldn't need the government to legally mandate them not to be awful, except in an emergency. The problem now is the definition of what constitutes an emergency - all the government has done is draw a reasonable line in the sand on this.
Aye that’s right mate… All the governments of the world have come together to concoct a made up new mutant virus just to ruin our Xmas here in the UK.All of this seems coincidental.
There was always going to be restrictions this winter in some capacity. There just had to be , it would have been ridicuous not to.
So instead of just announcing measures for the winter, it's off the back of a 'oh my god another variant!'.
And you wonder why people question all of this! It's transparent as they come , nothing changed and within 24 hours of 'discovering' a new variant , things change.
Load of nonsense now. I just wish the government could be competent enough to have said all of this back on July 19th , opening the country up but December 1st masks and stuff are coming back for the winter as a precautionary measure.
Either way, I can't see the % of people wearing masks going up much tbh. It's just going to result in confrontation and more fractures.
Taking them away and then partially introducing them again isn't going to revitalise people's mindset , which I guess is @Tubey 's point.
I think from a public health point of view experts have thought and advised it was a good idea for a while, politically i think the new varient may have been the smoke screen to hide regression. The UK posted 50k cases yesterday, that the first time its crossed that threshold this winter, the measures are the clever play - fair play to UK government.
We are at the point where things aren't making sense at all and all evidence is being discarded to suit a theoretical idea that is long since outdated.Indeed, that was my point above. All that matters apparently is caseload.
So if COVID is only killing the unvaccinated or the very vulnerable who'd have died regardless (99%+ at this point), then what's changed now to make a mask mandate necessary now and not necessary forever?
They said they'll revisit in three weeks - why? What will have changed? The variant will still be in circulation. Even if by some chance there's no more cases, there will be of the next dominant variant or whatever, so why on earth would we stop the mandate ever if it's deemed mandatory now?
What I'm really angry about is the leading scientists not knowing about this variant before it happened and announcing it last summerAye that’s right mate… All the governments of the world have come together to concoct a made up new mutant virus just to ruin our Xmas here in the UK.
Kirkby laNew Morrison’s has just opened close to me actually. Has a huge car park as well.
Ideal.
Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.