I just watched the BBC 1 o'clock news and the politics editor - a Jonathan Blake - tacked in a brief mention of Johnson's missing 5 Cobra meetings, but quickly quashed any notion it was wrong by saying this wasn't unusual and that HanCOCK was there anyway.
That's what we're up against with the BBC. It's why it should be burnt to the ground. Protecting a Prime Minister who's overseen a catastrophe.
The BBC will always protect the state. Take the mad cow/CJD disaster they didn't even attempt to hold the Thatcher and John Major governments to account and ask questions of those experts responsible for agriculture and public health. The BSE scandal should be a warning to what will attempt to take place when an inquiry is forced on the government. The BBC will 'play its part' in ensuring the government is protected as much as possible.
Focus: The BSE scandal | UK news | The Guardian
www.theguardian.com › oct › bse.focus1
"The civil service had fallen into what is known along the corridors of Whitehall as 'shaded-opinion'. When officials feel they know the mind of the minister, all options are couched in terms that the minister is likely to agree to. MAFF officials didn't tell Acheson of their own feelings on the issue of compensation because they thought MacGregor's mind was made up. It wasn't.
'I am a little surprised to find significance attached to things which were an aide-mémoire to me,' MacGregor said later of his notes scribbled in the margins. On such misunderstandings are problems built. It was another five months of delay and circulating memos before the slaughter scheme was finally agreed. In that time hundreds of infected carcasses had entered the food chain.
With Acheson and Pickles' opinions clear, Bradley knew pressure was growing on MAFF to give information more widely to the medical profession. In September 1987 he dropped a note to Watson suggesting publishing an article about BSE in the medical journal the Lancet. 'There are of course pros and cons,' Bradley said. 'What do you think?'
Watson replied. 'Not at present. It would over-emphasise the possible link to human spongiform encephalopathies.' So the public remained ignorant.
MAFF were determined to hold the line that beef was perfectly safe to eat. A week after Bradley's Lancet request, Rees knew that '[the DoH] are aware of the problem and have informally expressed some concern about any possible human health risks,' he wrote in a progress report to MacGregor. But less than a month later, Suich circulated this memo to press officers in case they had to answer questions on BSE.
'Q: Can it be transmitted to humans?'
'A: There is no evidence that it is transmissable to humans.'
There was no evidence, but there were concerns. It was MAFF's policy not to reveal them.