summerisle
The rain, it raineth every day
Might be of some use :
It's fairly straightforward ...
From https://www.england.nhs.uk/statistics/statistical-work-areas/covid-19-daily-deaths/ ( I've bolded the important stuff )
The spreadsheet for the NHS England deaths is on that site as well, and it's actually easier to see what it means by looking at the raw data.
Obviously this is the internet though, so there'll doubtless be conspiracy theories and accusations of incompetence being bandied about when the explanation is there in black and white for all to see.
Ok please respend to my post and not just inanely repeat yourself in bold. Deaths that happened today may not be reported for a week so the figures for today aren't accurate but may actually be low not high depending on how many actually die today. I don't get if you're trying to make a point that there's no as many dying as the figures say."Of the 823 new hospital deaths announced today by NHS England, 115 occurred on 10 April while 695 took place between 1-9 April.
The remaining 12 deaths occurred in March, with the earliest new death taking place on 25 March."
Really, you didnt know the government was responsible for looking after the nations health?I wasnt aware that the conservative party were responsible for a lack of face masks during a global pandemic.
At least now many other countries in the exact (or worse) situations know who to blame.
That's an almost meaningless equating of the two systems.Germany has an insurance-based system and they're doing quite well. Please don't try and use this situation to score political points.
It's fairly straightforward ...
From https://www.england.nhs.uk/statistics/statistical-work-areas/covid-19-daily-deaths/ ( I've bolded the important stuff )
The spreadsheet for the NHS England deaths is on that site as well, and it's actually easier to see what it means by looking at the raw data.
Obviously this is the internet though, so there'll doubtless be conspiracy theories and accusations of incompetence being bandied about when the explanation is there in black and white for all to see.
That's an almost meaningless equating of the two.
![]()
Opinion | A Better Path to Universal Health Care
The United States should look to Germany, not Canada, for the best model.www.nytimes.com
Ok please respend to my post and not just inanely repeat yourself in bold. Deaths that happened today may not be reported for a week so the figures for today aren't accurate but may actually be low not high depending on how many actually die today. I don't get if you're trying to make a point that there's no as many dying as the figures say.
But they arent saying the people have died today.
"As of 5pm on 10 April, of those hospitalised in the UK who tested positive for coronavirus, 9,875 have sadly died."
They are just giving us a daily report of how many deaths were registered today.
The only point i'm trying to make is that they've made a right balls up in the way they're reporting these figures. I'm not suggesting that the figures are incorrect, but they are being reported in a muddled manner
When people hear that the number of deaths has increased by 917 since yesterday, it would fair to assume that those 917 people died yesterday - and that simply isn't the case
Ah, so the Guardian et al are taking cumulative readings at the end of each day, subtracting yesterday's figure from today's, and passing this off as a daily death toll?
Just looked at the data in the spreadsheet, and daily from the 4-8th April the figures were around 650, which while they are likely to go up, they seem somewhat lower than the stats you see bandied around of around 1,000 per day?
... but the Guardian makes it sound like the daily stats are whenever deaths are able to be announced, even if that includes deaths that took place a week ago. Can they both be right or am I missing something?
I was in China about 10 years ago on a factory visit and we were took to this restaurant where basically we were given a plate and walked down this line the size of a football pitch to pick what we wanted to eat , by the time I got to the end I had nothing on my plate .At least some good news :
The city of Shenzen is set to become the first Chinese city to ban the sale of live animals for food and ban the sale of dog and cat meat for consumption.
The ban takes effect on May 1st.
Let`s see whether the rest of China follows suit.
Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.