We tax payers are subsidising private education enough.
Facts and figures to back that whopping, outlandish claim up? I wait with baited breath.
I can only use my partner's private school as an example but there the parents pay £3k per TERM for their kids to have a primary education: I know this because we have investigated the possibility of sending our own children there should we choose to have any in the future.
These parents also pay at least the same tax as the rest of us (some presumably paying more due the 40% tax rate) per year. I'm afraid they are subsidising state schools to a far greater and more obvious extent than the baseless claim you've made to the reverse.