Spadge Vernacular
Player Valuation: £70m
YesNot gonna talk about any of what you've said mate, just one very simple question, have you ever been to either country?
YesNot gonna talk about any of what you've said mate, just one very simple question, have you ever been to either country?
All about turn out
Let’s be brutally frank here, the threat posed by Putin’s Russia to Europe and the world is not just a distant concern - it’s a stark reality that impacts us all. Dismissing the Russia-Ukraine war as irrelevant is a dangerous oversimplification. This isn’t just about Ukraine, it’s about the fundamental principles of sovereignty and democracy that underlie global stability.
Putin's regime is actively undermining democratic institutions worldwide, including in the US, where attempts to influence our elections and support divisive figures like Trump are ongoing. This isn’t a fringe issue, it’s a calculated strategy aimed at eroding trust in our democratic processes.
As for Ukraine’s government, while it’s not without flaws (no government is) your thinking overlooks the existential threat posed by Russian aggression. Yes, Ukraine has its challenges, but supporting it is about standing against a tyrant w ho seeks to expand his colonial empire, not about blindly endorsing every aspect of its governance. The choices we make today will resonate for generations. If we fail to stand with those fighting against oppression, we risk emboldening authoritarianism, not just in Europe but right here at home. And let us be clear that Putin has carefully nurtured and brought together a cabal of dictators who he wants to provide a new world order of fascist minded despots.
It should be clear to anyone who has even just a passing interest in world matters that our security and values are intertwined. Dismissing Ukraine's struggle means ignoring the broader implications for democracy everywhere. It’s well beyond time to recognise the gravity of the situation and understand that defending Ukraine is about defending ourselves and the principles we claim to uphold.
Will come down to how motivated their base is...dems have a better ground game so may ge their vote out easierThing is who does a high or low turn out favour. Honestly no idea
Well, it's been in use as a singular since the 14th/15th century.Fully understand the difference between the two mate, also of an age when the two were used interchangeably - pre 90's, then again I still think of they/them as a plural pronoun rather than it now being used as a singular.
Also remember the days when you didn't have to call yourself CIS and when a gender wasn't assumed to be a doctor guessing but basing it on the biological evidence showing also what gender you are..
Wooah hang on a minute...how often have you had to refer to yourself as Cis outside of twitter/forums..and the doctor guessing bit...when has that ever happened?Fully understand the difference between the two mate, also of an age when the two were used interchangeably - pre 90's, then again I still think of they/them as a plural pronoun rather than it now being used as a singular.
Also remember the days when you didn't have to call yourself CIS and when a gender wasn't assumed to be a doctor guessing but basing it on the biological evidence showing also what gender you are..
I am going with Trump to win with more than 290 in the electoral college as my prediction. Harris isn't popular with Democrats, and those on the fence that have seen their disposable income slashed under her and Biden won't be in a rush to vote for her.Think Harris will win. My final prediction 4 days off.
Really? This is from a week agoI am going with Trump to win with more than 290 in the electoral college as my prediction. Harris isn't popular with Democrats, and those on the fence that have seen their disposable income slashed under her and Biden won't be in a rush to vote for her.

Must just be amongst the large number of Democrat friends I have (about 20) from the States. None of them can stand her but are voting because she's not Trump.Really? This is from a week ago
![]()
Kamala Harris as popular among Democrats as Obama in 2008: poll
A new survey has found a 72 percent approval rating for Kamala Harris among Democratic voters — one of the highest of any nominee going back 70 years.www.newsweek.com
View attachment 280055
That also goes to show that you can't rely on polls to call an election.Really? This is from a week ago
![]()
Kamala Harris as popular among Democrats as Obama in 2008: poll
A new survey has found a 72 percent approval rating for Kamala Harris among Democratic voters — one of the highest of any nominee going back 70 years.www.newsweek.com
View attachment 280055
Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.