Current Affairs Ukraine

Status
Not open for further replies.
The maniac wants to rebuild the Soviet Union, it won't end with the Ukraine if we stand by and do nothing now, and sanctions don't work. He wants a new cold war, with fingers hovering over the big red nuke buttons.

It's not just about money, he's already stupidly wealthy, but if he and his cronies get even wealthier, then all the better for them.
Yes but those who are stupidity wealthy always want to become even more stupidity wealthy.. it's 100% about money.
 
The maniac wants to rebuild the Soviet Union, it won't end with the Ukraine if we stand by and do nothing now, and sanctions don't work. He wants a new cold war, with fingers hovering over the big red nuke buttons.

It's not just about money, he's already stupidly wealthy, but if he and his cronies get even wealthier, then all the better for them.
Personally, I don't think he does. This is all based down to his and his cronies belief in Russian national security as this will come before money and the people.

Making Ukraine a part of the wider Russian sphere may be idealogical to some extent, however it also offers the buffer he desires - one less country in NATO.
 
That would be interesting.
There have been lots of squabbles between the two on the border regions, Putin expelled High numbers from the Russian side a few years a go as he said it was becoming to Chinese in the make up of the population.
The Chinese will do what they do best sit back and see which way they can they can exploit the situation.
Either let Russia become the international bogey man and side with the West and get better relations or side with Russia and use fear to get what they want, either way they win.
Putin has just but Russia in the lap of China they have nowhere else to turn, ironic from the so called hard man he is now China 's bitch a lap dog for his new master's.
 
I agree with this, but that only came about due to Molotov's influence earlier in the war. When Barbarossa started, he'd already purged most the Red Army.

He then disappeared off to his dacha and let the situation spiral. If it wasn't for Zhukov, Molotov et al. coupled with Hitler's own madness, they'd have lost.

@ToffeeTim wait until next week's episode (I haven't seen it). After von Stauffenberg, Hitler ignored pretty much all major advice apart from the cowards around him.
That's the assassination attempt isn't it? I've seen Valkyrie, but not sure how accurate it is!
 
That's the assassination attempt isn't it? I've seen Valkyrie, but not sure how accurate it is!
It's relatively accurate in terms of events, but from what I've read/know von Stauffenberg is portrayed in a way for film and audiences, if that makes sense.

He was more pro-Germany without Hitler rather than anti-war: there's always been talk that if it had been successful, it was to help create better leadership.

From a Prussian aristocratic and military family, they had an issue with Hitler and his cronies and their direction, rather than some 'heartfelt' resistance.

I'd recommend visiting the Bendlerblock, where he was actually executed, if you're ever in Berlin.
 
Last edited:
I agree with this, but that only came about due to Molotov's influence earlier in the war. When Barbarossa started, he'd already purged most the Red Army.

He then disappeared off to his dacha and let the situation spiral. If it wasn't for Zhukov, Molotov et al. coupled with Hitler's own madness, they'd have lost.

@ToffeeTim wait until next week's episode (I haven't seen it). After von Stauffenberg, Hitler ignored pretty much all major advice apart from the cowards around him.

It was Hitler's decision to go into Stalingrad instead of pivoting around it to take the oilfields that were the whole point of invading Russia in the first place. One of history's most bonkers military decisions.
 
It was Hitler's decision to go into Stalingrad instead of pivoting around it to take the oilfields that were the whole point of invading Russia in the first place. One of history's most bonkers military decisions.
It was one of the most bonkers decisions to halt and not take Moscow during '40 when they could. This was before the Siberian units had come across.

It was even more bonkers to then go south in '41 and with Army Group South attempt to take Ukraine, the Caucasus oil fields and the Black Sea, in one go.

Hitler had many, many capable generals. When he listened to them, they often did well. When he ignored them, they did very, very badly.
 
The maniac wants to rebuild the Soviet Union, it won't end with the Ukraine if we stand by and do nothing now, and sanctions don't work. He wants a new cold war, with fingers hovering over the big red nuke buttons.

It's not just about money, he's already stupidly wealthy, but if he and his cronies get even wealthier, then all the better for them.
Boris better sanction the entire list of Russian oligarchs in this country and get them out, no excuses no half measures. Putins Russia is now a rogue state and no amount of donations can excuse this, take it all off all of them and boot them out! Re-write the law and make it so, its what the will of the people wanted!
 
Scary times these.

Such a tightrope. Appease to de-escalate and that may embolden him to take aim at another ex USSR country he wants back, until we get to the point he goes one too far but by then has a bigger army, more weapons.

On the other hand if you go too far with sanctions that starts to cripple the country then they may attack outwards anyhow. Although you would imagine with the resources Russia should be self sufficient unlike say NK...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.

🛒 Visit Shop

Support Grand Old Team by checking out our latest Everton gear!
Back
Top