Tipp blue
If I agreed with you, we’d both be wrong.
Well said.. concise and accurate response.?Yes.
Well said.. concise and accurate response.?Yes.
I watched a documentary on bbc about Stalingrad the other night, and they talked about this a lot. It was just irrational decision after irrational decision, surrounded by yes men, who would get promoted over actual competent professionals.
Obviously, you didn't even think Putin would go through with it. ??
TBF by that stage of the war he was much better than he had been before the war, or would be after 1945.
By that time he had mostly binned off the likes of Voroshilov and Kulik (though of course they didn’t get a bullet in the head (well Kulik did but that was much later), put in camps or have their families rounded up unlike so many less guilty, more competent men and women), and replaced them with people who ranged from adequate to some of the greatest generals of the last century.
He's after the massive gas reserves in Western Ukraine an estimated 1% of the world's total gas reserves.. this is what it's about nothing else.No I didn't see it happenning, not going to lie. Definitely not so soon any way. I still can't work out the rationale for wanting go beyond the previously controlled areas. But that's probably where I'm making the mistake - logic and rationale don't matter.
If China take a side it will be with USA and Europe, far too much at stake economically for them to back Russia. At the end of the day money is all that matters.. Putin is making a play for Ukraine for the massive gas reserves in the west, much like in 2014 when Crimea was taken.. Money is what it's about end of. China has much more to lose by backing Russia in this.
That would be interesting.TBF I don’t think they do, and it’s a smart move for them.
Allow Russia to exist as an isolated, friendless state that is almost entirely dependent on them and they are quids in; all their energy needs are met and if they ever think Siberia would be a nice this to have no one in the rest of the world will lift a finger.
no, there is a genuine blood and soil issue at hand here as well.He's after the massive gas reserves in Western Ukraine an estimated 1% of the world's total gas reserves.. this is what it's about nothing else.
Part of it in the short term... Although food security is also in there and part of the long term aims. Wheat, barley and rye that much of Europe relies on, Ukraine It’s also a big producer of corn.He's after the massive gas reserves in Western Ukraine an estimated 1% of the world's total gas reserves.. this is what it's about nothing else.
It was more about the Nazi side but it was interesting to see how dictators try to surround themselves with people who will never disagree rather than the best people.
I'm not so sure.. it's always been about gas.no, there is a genuine blood and soil issue at hand here as well.
www.forbes.com
I agree with this, but that only came about due to Molotov's influence earlier in the war. When Barbarossa started, he'd already purged most the Red Army.TBF by that stage of the war he was much better than he had been before the war, or would be after 1945.
By that time he had mostly binned off the likes of Voroshilov and Kulik (though of course they didn’t get a bullet in the head (well Kulik did but that was much later), put in camps or have their families rounded up unlike so many less guilty, more competent men and women), and replaced them with people who ranged from adequate to some of the greatest generals of the last century.
Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.