They’re still of the thinking that good soldiers/infantry work on bullying hierarchy. They’re quickly learning the truth
I've been pondering on this for a while. For me and many, discipline is a huge part of a strong, effective army - in fact, it is the backbone of what makes one.
Napoleon's
Grande Armée were famous for the discipline and professional, and so much so Wellington had to use the Provosts to harshly shape his man.
Failure to do so would have meant they'd have struggled to stand up against them. Think similar with the Old Contemptibles and many 'professional'* armies.
Part of that is that a high-bar when it comes to standards such as drill (add borking GIF), dress and the general basics. These form the backbone.
I think back to getting beasted for stuff, a boss smacking me around the head and being verbally abused. Now some took pleasure from it, I totally accept that.
But I'd say from my personal experience, the vast majority did it for the sole purpose of ensuring standards, which could/would ultimately keep us alive.
And there it comes to the crux of it... can you look at them and go, '
I get it, they're actually a good leader' or are they purely sadists in it for themselves.
The former can and does add to moral. The latter doesn't and that's what I suspect is happening over there in Russia where there's no moral and no discipline.
If you're not committed to the fight and trust in those above you, you're already half way to defeat. Wanting to cut off a man's ear for dress? What the fluff?
How's that going to build moral and momentum? Worse, I'm sure said general should be far more concerned with many other aspects than that right now.
He needs to get his priorities in check.
*
I'm talking less here about professional (standing) armies in the purest sense, but rather the effective ones.