its Syrian mercenaries not the actual countryIf they involve Belarus and Syria isn't this the start of a world war, terrified saying this like .nato can't get involved but they can scary.
Ah sound good info didn't know, bloody scary thoits Syrian mercenaries not the actual country
How difficult would it be to fly to Moscow and take out Putin? Asking for a friend.This is it
The most hated man in the world today and he’s untouchable
He’s gone full Colonel Kurtz, he needs to be terminated with extreme prejudice.It’s staggering, that after Hitler, the world has to put up with a single man who can drag Europe and Russia to the precipice. Ffs Russians just kill the mad b’stard……
I need to send the Colombian cartel to do the jobHe’s gone full Colonel Kurtz, he needs to be terminated with extreme prejudice.
More like mutual offense in this caseBelarus and Russia have a mutual defence agreement like NATO does.
I could be wrong, but it seems like you are actually quite keen for an escalation of the war, and that you probably haven't thought that the consequences of NATO getting involved militarily would most likely lead to the use of nuclear weapons.We are being frightened by the thought that two or three UK squaddies may be fighting there. Meanwhile the Russians are bringing in thousands from the Middle East and Belarus is joining in. NATO needs to get off its knees and tell Putin to do one. Meanwhile if Belarus sets one foot over the border, we should bomb the crap out of them and invade, purely to remove weapons and residual NAZI’s…..obviously taking care not to hit any Russians….as we don’t want to upset Putin……
I know where Tom Cruise keeps his P51 Mustang and the company who are securing it. So if you want to fly to Moscow I'm sure we can borrow it haha!How difficult would it be to fly to Moscow and take out Putin? Asking for a friend.
I see this used a lot, but why is that the case? I mean across NATO the collective armed forces and nuclear arsenal are far larger than that of Russia. If a NATO member was invaded would we be using the same language, that we can't fight back because Putin might use a nuclear weapon?I could be wrong, but it seems like you are actually quite keen for an escalation of the war, and that you probably haven't thought that the consequences of NATO getting involved militarily would most likely lead to the use of nuclear weapons.
Well, yes. I agree that a lot of people make this assumption, when it's unlikely that even Putin would resort to strategic nuckear weapons in the event of NATO involvement. On the other hand, the consequences would be so horrific that 'unlikely' is still too much of a risk, really.I see this used a lot, but why is that the case? I mean across NATO the collective armed forces and nuclear arsenal are far larger than that of Russia. If a NATO member was invaded would we be using the same language, that we can't fight back because Putin might use a nuclear weapon?
Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.