D
Deleted member 48881
Guest
Poor putin
We had Austrians rule over us for 400 years, and interestingly enough, old empire is not remembered as some evil entity, but still a lot of respect.Mate the Ottomans ruled us for 500 years, doing horrible acts of brutality. The UN? Nowhere in sight.
Really? The Russians are occupying the areas they want to and holding cities under siege, with minimal damage to infrastructure.No, he'll be looking to appoint someone that doesn't make false promises. It's evident that the general staff had an overly rosy view of how an invasion would go, didn't have the troops at full readiness and made some substantial mistakes with logistics.
That gets generals and marshals fired in Moscow, whether it's the Soviet Union or Russia.
Bet the UN also didn't do jack for that.We had Austrians rule over us for 400 years, and interesntigly enough, old empire is not remembered as some evil entity, but still a lot of respect.
Vienna is still seen as inherently aristocratic city, and when you want to praise someone on gentlemanly behavior, you say "Vienna School"
What do you regard as minimal, realistically?Really? The Russians are occupying the areas they want to and holding cities under siege, with minimal damage to infrastructure.
Not sure how its going that badly? May even have been the plan.
As good as can be expected, when you invade a countryWhat do you regard as minimal, realistically?
How on Earth do you know that?Really? The Russians are occupying the areas they want to
But it's not minimal - they have damaged electric and powerplants, roads are demolished, flats and houses as well.As good as can be expected, when you invade a country
Like I said, I dont think Russia would describe this as a failed intervention, that would demand replacement of its military generals. Which was the original point being made.But it's not minimal - they have damaged electric and powerplants, roads are demolished, flats and houses as well.
Minimal is great when you're far away, but if it was your own place being turned to its building blocks it wouldn't be "minimal", you know?
They won't, as they participate. Much like North Korea, Russia doesn't do anything wrong, only victories for the Great Russian Empire.Like I said, I dont think Russia would describe this as a failed intervention. Which was the original point being made.
A level-headed and rational person would, but we're talking here about an autocratic leader who is under a lot of pressure. Historically, that's not a good mix.No, he'll be looking to appoint someone that doesn't make false promises. It's evident that the general staff had an overly rosy view of how an invasion would go, didn't have the troops at full readiness and made some substantial mistakes with logistics.
That gets generals and marshals fired in Moscow, whether it's the Soviet Union or Russia.
Monsters.Mate the Ottomans ruled us for 500 years, doing horrible acts of brutality. The UN? Nowhere in sight.
They're well behind timetable judging from their logistics, and don't have air superiority despite overwhelming numbers. These are failures.Really? The Russians are occupying the areas they want to and holding cities under siege, with minimal damage to infrastructure.
Not sure how its going that badly? May even have been the plan.
Yes certainly, its not pleasant. I was responding to the point being made which was Putin might hold his generals to account for military failure.They won't, as they participate. Much like North Korea, Russia doesn't do anything wrong, only victories for the Great Russian Empire.
Intervention... of what? Intervening with the peace and lives of civilians?
Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.