Spadge Vernacular
Player Valuation: £70m
You have this backwards - it’s those incidents, and all the daily reminders that they are not Russian, that is the primary driver behind the generation of a distinct Ukrainian identity. They might have been attempts to erase it but they’ve created and then strengthened it.
Putin was right when he said that 400 years ago there wasn’t a “Ukraine ”; that there is now is almost entirely down to Russian government policy during that time.
I have it backwards? Or you've done your usual?
Oppression can and does fuel resistance and strengthen identity. That said, it’s important not to reduce Ukrainian identity to a byproduct of Russian policy. Ukraine has a rich cultural and historical legacy that predates Russian control, and attempts to erase it, like the Holodomor, were meant to destroy, not create, national identity. While Russian repression may have galvanised resistance, it doesn’t change the fact that Ukraine’s unique identity has existed independently of Russian influence for centuries. Putin’s claim that there wasn’t a Ukraine 400 years ago misses the point that many modern nations didn’t exist in their current form, but that doesn’t negate the legitimacy of their identity today
Kyiv, was founded in 482 and is one of the oldest cities in Europe, predating Moscow by 665 years. Moscow itself was founded by Yuriy Dolgoruky, the Grand Prince of Kyiv, illustrating that the cultural and political roots of modern Russia actually stem from Kyiv. Ignoring this history is a key part of Russian propaganda, which seeks to erase Ukraine's deep historical legacy and portray Ukrainian identity as a modern or artificial creation. The reality is that Ukraine has a rich, independent history that Russia attempts to obscure to justify its own expansionist ambitions, which, from that post, you have bought into.
