Current Affairs Ukraine

Status
Not open for further replies.
Interesting point about North Korea is that it’s unlikely that Russia actually need weapons from them, it’s more of a question of brining then into an alliance.

Putin/Russia are escalating just not in a kinetic direct manner against the west, they are escalating in unconventional ways, the latest escalation(as viewed by the West) is increased contact/ties with North Korea. This is actually a huge act as it may open the door for NK to emerge from the isolation the US has put them in for the last 20 or so years
Respect for the absolute levels of nonsense you will go to to deny facts snd create fantasy, it is a skill in itself. You’ve literally never admitted one single incident of putin having failed

Bravo
 
I did a search whoch shows it to be about 100,000. Not sure if that includes all armed forces or just army

I wonder where he got the 25k number from, have seen him mention that number a few times 🤷‍♂️
That would be army, navy and raf I imagine, not too sure about reservists - there will be informed people on here to clarify

Our armed forces have been absolutely decimated in recent years though
 
There seems to be a lot of confusion over the taking the village of Andriivka

Yesterday deputy defence minister Hanna Maliar suggested on her Telegram channel that Ukrainian forces had taken the village of Andriivka, which is in Donetsk.

There was then some suggestion that the announcement had been premature, and that Ukraine had not achieved its objective. However, this morning Suspilne reports that the general staff have again claimed to have taken the settlement. Suspilne writes:

The defence forces took control of Andriivka during an assault, continue their offensive, and have partial success in the Klishchiivka region of Donetsk region, the general staff reported.
The 3rd separate assault brigade confirmed the release of Andriivka and declared the 72nd brigade of the Russian Federation “totally destroyed”. They added that the battles are currently ongoing, Ukrainian military forces are establishing themselves in new positions.
The claims have not been independently verified.
 
There seems to be a lot of confusion over the taking the village of Andriivka

Yesterday deputy defence minister Hanna Maliar suggested on her Telegram channel that Ukrainian forces had taken the village of Andriivka, which is in Donetsk.

There was then some suggestion that the announcement had been premature, and that Ukraine had not achieved its objective. However, this morning Suspilne reports that the general staff have again claimed to have taken the settlement. Suspilne writes:


The claims have not been independently verified.
It's a village here, a village there for these people. Thats what this counter offensive has been reduced to.
 
Hanna Maliar given a dressing down by the Ukrainian 3rd Assault Brigade re capture of Andriivka:

Ukraine's Third Assault Brigade, fighting around Bakhmut, denied an earlier report by Deputy Defense Minister Hanna Maliar that the village of Andriivka, Donetsk Oblast, had been liberated. "The statement about the liberation of Andriivka is false and premature. Currently, serious and heavy fighting continues in Klishchiivka and Andriivka," the brigade reported. "Such statements are harmful, threaten the lives of personnel, and harm the performance of combat missions."

 
I'm not sure how that is relevant to your previous post, but I do remember he met with Trump, so he doesn't seem to be too consistent with who he meets 🤷‍♂️
its completely relevant, in that Kishida seems desperate to meet him, but Kim is having none of it.

Trump may have been trying to head off Putin actually, which was a point not picked up on at the time when most western observers were shocked that they were meeting at all.
 
I can - not only because of the strategic importance and the easily visible alternative (ie: Turkiye joining BRICS) providing a spur to make it happen, but also because of the problems you cite being an easily observable consequence of expanding into areas that were not part of the original bloc. Deepening the relationship of the EU amongst its current membership only makes it less likely that states outside the bloc would ever join; they'd be required to sacrifice too much,

For all the issues PIS and Orban (and others) have caused, the past few years have shown these are not insurmountable and, in Poland's case about defence and geopolitics especially, they were more correct than some states further West were.

I think the next wave of expansion is Serbia and Turkiye, but I agree about Ukraine being further back.
The EU has to work for its citizens - not the citizens of non-members. You say that deepening the union would make it less likely that others outside would join because they'd have to sacrifice too much. But you are completely ignoring what the member states would have to sacrifice to accommodate nations that, right now, are at best quasi-democratic, corrupt, and hugely impoverished. As Brexit told the British, the EU supports its members' interests - not those of former members or putative future members. Otherwise, it collapses.

As things stand, Turkey won't be coming in any time soon, if ever. Greece and Cyprus will veto it. Solution? Remove the veto. Problem? Poland and Hungary will veto that. Ukraine won't be coming in any time soon either. To allow them in, every single state that is a net beneficiary of EU funds today will become a net contributor overnight. The EU is an amazing achievement. But it's fragile. Expansion - on merit - for the right reasons at the right time is the only way forward. Expansion for geopolitical expediency will sow the seeds of its destruction.
 
Heres a google for you


  • The armed forces would run out of ammunition "in a few days" if called upon to fight
  • The UK lacks the ability to defend its skies against the level of missile and drone strikes that Ukraine is enduring
  • It would take five to 10 years for the army to be able to field a war-fighting division of some 25,000 to 30,000 troops backed by tanks, artillery and helicopters
MSM tit-head.
 
It should perhaps at this point be pointed out what one of the main reasons Kishida has for wanting to talk to Kim, and why Kim might not want to:

I am sure that is one issue, amongst lots of others. Interesting though that this call comes 1 day after he met Putin.

As for NK, I wouldnt be surprised to see some NK military observers on or near the front line. Despite being heavily militarised it doesnt have real combat experience at present. Ukraine gives them that chance. The same goes for its weapons.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.

🛒 Visit Shop

Support Grand Old Team by checking out our latest Everton gear!
Back
Top