Current Affairs Ukraine

Status
Not open for further replies.
It is a massive danger. I’m amazed he is allowed to keep on firing so many of these things into space. SpaceX have made a huge leap in terms of reusable rockets for sure and that is amazing for us exploring the Solar System. But Starlink is littering the sky with these satellites and we have no idea what amount of information they are mining. And as we now know he has the ability to change the course of a major war by shutting them off at will.
Given this and Musk’s business interests in China you can see why Taiwan is trying to avoid using Starlink.
 
He didn't say nuclear war, he said escalation. His biographer claimed it was to avert nuclear war.

And one thing Musk is right on: it's not his job to facilitate military operations by nation states and hand them satellite internet services to sink war ships.

Imagine believing it is.
Why apply for Pentagon contracts if you don't want to facilitate military operations?
 
Oh I dunno. Tech advances with AI and swarming kamikaze drones will have a big part to play in this and any future wars. Factor in additive manufacturing of these cheap FPV drones and you can see how quickly massed swarms could be brought to bear on the battlefield. New factories springing up all over Ukraine atm.

https://www.sculpteo.com/en/industries/drones/3d-printed-drone/
Like I said, they'll still have a use on the battlefield, and as you say there's the use of AI with swarming drones and more advanced versions will facilitate this.

Yet at the moment, many of the drone attacks aren't sophisticated, but rather an operator flying a small, cheap drone with a crude munition attached to it.

In a slow, immobile front like we've seen, these work particularly well - easy targets; if it gets more mobile, it will be less so - not completely of course.

Drones are the way forward in war, and the west and China are working on this already, however it may need to become more refined.
 
Lol.. come on lad..you say most Russians believe they are winning the war and you believe them... what's the alternative for a Russian to say.. it's either say that they believe they are winning or get locked up... how can you possibly think it's a good idea to come onto a forum and say what you just said?
Because forums like these are nothing more than ideological battlegrounds. It’s all par for the course imo and I am totally unphased by it.

I realise most people who post here live in the uk and we as a nation are front and centre of the Anglo-Saxon imperialistic Russophobic agenda.
 
Like I said, they'll still have a use on the battlefield, and as you say there's the use of AI with swarming drones and more advanced versions will facilitate this.

Yet at the moment, many of the drone attacks aren't sophisticated, but rather an operator flying a small, cheap drone with a crude munition attached to it.

In a slow, immobile front like we've seen, these work particularly well - easy targets; if it gets more mobile, it will be less so - not completely of course.

Drones are the way forward in war, and the west and China are working on this already, however it may need to become more refined.
It’s a good point about static frontlines. In a different type of conflict I wonder how relevant they are in their present state
 
Why apply for Pentagon contracts if you don't want to facilitate military operations?

I've no appetite to be defending Musk. But whatever he signed up for is irrelevant to me. The decision he took probably stopped a major escalation.

This is a sideshow. I said to you from post one in this conversation that the turning off of Starlink is a distraction...it distracts from the real purpose of the attack on Musk: 1/ Twitter serving as a platform for pro-Russian content and, 2/ to blame anyone else for the counter-offensive's insipid progress other than the Ukrainians and their western military advisers.
 
If he can do it to Ukraine he can do it to the US too. I fully expect there will be hearings in congress about whether one man’s control of satellite systems is a danger to national security.
The bigger question - which the capitalists in Congress fail to ask - is why are countries depending on private individuals for such technology? Oh right, lower taxes and the ability to outsource essential technology to "entrepreneurs" giving them competitive advantages and possible monopolies. Win-win. To anybody paying attention, Musk is a headbanger. Allowing him such control over such technology is ideological vandalism.
 


If these figures are even fairly accurately (who really knows to be fair), it would be costing Russia £240m per day, so £1.68bn per week.

They had been making a billion dollars a day with gas and oil exports alone. For a long time. iirc. Although some of that has stopped, it has been restructured elsewhere.
 
They had been making a billion dollars a day with gas and oil exports alone. For a long time. iirc. Although some of that has stopped, it has been restructured elsewhere.
I'm not an expert on Russia finances, especially oil and whatnot, but Reuters puts the figure $8.3bn per month, which would be equivalent to £6.6bn.

To be fair, it is first important to mention this is a fair drop from the revenues gained in the past. Now, even if that figure isn't fully correct, we can work from it.

If it's costing them roughly £1.68bn per week to run the war, so £7-9bn per month, and they're gaining as a minimum £7.4bn per month from revenue...

... you can see it'll really impact on their economy. Even if the revenue is higher, so say £12bn per month, the state is still losing a good few billion per week.

This doesn't even account for the oligarchs/mafia and whatnot who will still want their skim, and will do whatever they can to siphon off their cut.

In simple terms, they're generating less money from oil and gas, and are spending more on the war - their balance book can't be looking great.

 
Because forums like these are nothing more than ideological battlegrounds. It’s all par for the course imo and I am totally unphased by it.

I realise most people who post here live in the uk and we as a nation are front and centre of the Anglo-Saxon imperialistic Russophobic agenda.
My point had nothing to do with that, I was making the point, that you know that Russians have to say they believe Russia are winning or they can get locked up, and even with that knowledge you still say you believe them, I would suggest that most Russians don't even believe what they are saying themselves.. People aren't going to take you seriously on a forum if you are saying things like that..
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.

🛒 Visit Shop

Support Grand Old Team by checking out our latest Everton gear!
Back
Top