Runub
Player Valuation: £70m
Seriously, I do wonder how she's still allowed to talk to the press. On another note...
Send her over to have a one on one with Putin
Seriously, I do wonder how she's still allowed to talk to the press. On another note...
I’m not defending what she says here but I wanted to check and it was said before the war started. Don’t agree with what she is saying at all, wouldn’t have agreed then and don’t agree with it now. But posting it without context (the Tweeter, not you) makes it seem as though she is saying it now after almost a year of war. She may well still believe it but it’s a bit of a stretch to link it to what Starmer said today.
I personally think thats just as damning. When people confidently proclaim lies to be true, they get found out when actual things happen. Often they anticipate they can say whatever they want with no consequences because theres enough ambiguity that nobody knows what would happen for sure. But then sometimes, like in this case, it does, and reveals those who are arrogantly the most incompetent, the most insane, or most evil among us. Regardless, none of those are fit for public office and they get found out when they did NOT expect to be.I’m not defending what she says here but I wanted to check and it was said before the war started. Don’t agree with what she is saying at all, wouldn’t have agreed then and don’t agree with it now. But posting it without context (the Tweeter, not you) makes it seem as though she is saying it now after almost a year of war. She may well still believe it but it’s a bit of a stretch to link it to what Starmer said today.
My post wasn’t about what she said. As I said I don’t agree with what she said then and if she said it now I wouldn’t agree with it still. My point was you can’t apply what she said over a year ago to what Starmer said today. If she said it today and he didn’t deal with it and disown her view I would call him out for that. Or if he was presented with that video today and he defended it I would be equally annoyed.I personally think thats just as damning. When people confidently proclaim lies to be true, they get found out when actual things happen. Often they anticipate they can say whatever they want with no consequences because theres enough ambiguity that nobody knows what would happen for sure. But then sometimes, like in this case, it does, and reveals those who are arrogantly the most incompetent, the most insane, or most evil among us. Regardless, none of those are fit for public office and they get found out when they did NOT expect to be.
Sorry, yeah, you cant quite equivalate them, but part of my point is that it doesnt necessarily make it better that once shes badly proven wrong she changes(and never apologizes for) her previously (and probably purposeful) extreme view. It means shes never held accountable. On that note I almost respect someone more who at least is willing to be consistent and honest with their bad views. If she apoligized and noted she was wrong on her very confident view thats fine, but thats almost never seen.My post wasn’t about what she said. As I said I don’t agree with what she said then and if she said it now I wouldn’t agree with it still. My point was you can’t apply what she said over a year ago to what Starmer said today. If she said it today and he didn’t deal with it and disown her view I would call him out for that. Or if he was presented with that video today and he defended it I would be equally annoyed.
This is proper WW2 stuff.
This is proper WW2 stuff.
This is proper WW2 stuff.
The mass use of artillery is akin to WWI, with some reports suggesting that Russia has at peak times been expending between 40,000 and 50,000 shells per day.Actually more like the trenches in first WW. horrific.
Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.