AND ITS LIVE
*makes note to review confession schedule at local parishAND ITS LIVE
Olenya is first on NATO’s target list - always has beenAND ITS LIVE
I've repeatedly said that I doubt the outcome will be nuclear conflict; the use of nuclear weapons as a deterrent is different from their actual implementation.If Russia is posturing, as you say, then nothing to worry about.
I'm afraid that nuclear able nations have been using nuclear weapons since 1945. Nothing has changed.
I'm sure there would be a response to a nuclear attack on Ukraine. I just doubt that it would be nuclear.
I'd suggest that it is the human nature element that runs through leadership and the broader sense of preventitive diplomacy possible within the limits of Putins duplicityClassic 'good cop, bad cop' tactics.
In general, the problem with these situations is that 'winning' is about managing risk perception in the eyes of other human beings, which is a chancy proposition with ample opportunities for misperception landing everyone where no one wanted to be.
Is your argument that the Westphalian system is as bogus as FFP, then? It's definitely there for the taking if you want to pick it up.
I've repeatedly said that I doubt the outcome will be nuclear conflict; the use of nuclear weapons as a deterrent is different from their actual implementation.
Take it with as much salt as you'd like, but the grapevine is suggesting that the US have made it clear that there'll be catastrophic results for Russia if they do.
Will it be nuclear? Will it be conventional? Either way, the Russian command and control (leadership) would be targeted.
The point of the whole thing was never to end war. It was more or less to recognize that everybody at the table had the same 'divine right' to govern inside its borders irrespective of the monarch's religion. They fully intended to continue to batter at one another to move the borders when the occasion suited.Since it was established near 400 years ago, just look at countries borders today, treaties diplomatically agreed too as per it's tenants that either led to further conflicts resulting etc, in theory the system is an excellent one, but it simply has repeatedly failed ever since it's inception.
Like any system it's not what the rules and regulations are that ultimately matter, it's how they are implemented.
Same as the UN in theory is a wonderful thing, but even it's most ardent support must see how it repeatedly fails as any form of body.
Are there better systems, I don't know, but the current ones just don't work.


Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.