H
So they are experts because they say they are? Anyone can cut and paste from Wikipedia. Yours is just another post full of acronyms. US generals,military advisors and Biden have quoted that Russia has fired multiple hypersonic missiles in this war. I'll take their word before a random bloke on a football forum thank you.
Hmmm, you are arguing for the sake of arguing.
I haven't disputed that Russia have used "hyoersonics" at all.
What I am saying is not an invulnerable weapon that has handling characteristics that defy physics.
I also said that the US wasn't lagging behind in hypersonic missile tech because they really offer no advantage over the current inventory.
Whatever is presented in the media should only ever be taken at best at face value, and it rarely reflects the actual state of play.
And just as the parting gift, to use your own logic, why the heck would anyone listen to you, "a random bloke on a football forum" any more than me or the other actually knowledgeable folk who visit here.
Acronym list for those who apparently have no clue about anything:
SSGN - Ship, Submersible Guided missile, Nuclear powered
Trident C-4 - a model of SLBM
Trident D-5 - a model of SLBM
SLBM - Submarine Launched Ballistic Missile
RNZN - Royal New Zealand Navy
ANZAC - Australia New Zealand Army Core (the class of frigate purchased by Australia and new Zealand named for the ANZAC's)