Tom Cannon

Status
Not open for further replies.


I was astonished to find out that he’s nearly 20. Thought he was about 17. Why do we do this to our young players? Why wasn’t he out on loan 2 years ago? Yet another player who’s wasted crucial developmental years playing kid’s footy.
 
I was astonished to find out that he’s nearly 20. Thought he was about 17. Why do we do this to our young players? Why wasn’t he out on loan 2 years ago? Yet another player who’s wasted crucial developmental years playing kid’s footy.

But he's also 20, not 25, so it doesn't really matter. He can still go away and get that experience.
 
But he's also 20, not 25, so it doesn't really matter. He can still go away and get that experience.

Of course it matters. Why are we content to write off years of a young player’s career? He’s far less likely to develop into the player he could’ve become if he’d started that development plan when he was 17 or 18.
 
I was astonished to find out that he’s nearly 20. Thought he was about 17. Why do we do this to our young players? Why wasn’t he out on loan 2 years ago? Yet another player who’s wasted crucial developmental years playing kid’s footy.
Aside from the obvious and well argued point of loans not always being beneficial, did anybody even want him 2 years ago? We don't get to just place these lads wherever we want, someone actually has to want to take them and play them. I think you're slightly overestimating the appeal of taking an underdeveloped 17 year old kid from an academy when you're playing competitive league football.
 

Of course it matters. Why are we content to write off years of a young player’s career? He’s far less likely to develop into the player he could’ve become if he’d started that development plan when he was 17 or 18.
I get it, Rooney was a freak, but I always think its a bit suss when a lad gets to his 20s and hasnt been given a run out.

And before people start, yes im aware he was given 30seconds twice.
 
Aside from the obvious and well argued point of loans not always being beneficial, did anybody even want him 2 years ago? We don't get to just place these lads wherever we want, someone actually has to want to take them and play them. I think you're slightly overestimating the appeal of taking an underdeveloped 17 year old kid from an academy when you're playing competitive league football.

Actually this is why clubs in the 21st century, of which we are clearly not one of, have a network of clubs in the lower divisions and worldwide where they send young players to get minutes, it’s called a feeder club. So they can do exactly that, send young players wherever they want. Do we have any feeder clubs? This isn’t a brand new cutting edge development in football, teams like Chelsea and Man Utd have been doing this since the early 00’s. We are the most old fashioned football club in the world, we are not equipped for the modern game in any way shape or form.
 
But I mean you have zero way of proving this lol

It’s just literally common sense. I can’t “prove” to you that it’s gonna be cold tomorrow either, but you couldn’t genuinely put an argument forward that it’s not going to be. How can you possibly argue that a player playing U21s football at the age of 19 is more beneficial than playing lower league football?
 

Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join Grand Old Team to get involved in the Everton discussion. Signing up is quick, easy, and completely free.

Shop

Back
Top