Tim Cahill

Status
Not open for further replies.
As good as Cahill was he wasn’t close to Heath.
Heath was one the best players I’ve ever seen. A true great.
If you doubt this take some time to glance back at the last time we were champions, amongst his goals you will see a clutch of brilliant headers every bit as impressive as Cahills , the more so given his size.
Heath was perfection.
Cahill was good.

Bizarrely both played 226 times for the blues. Heath scored 71 and Cahill 56. Cahill would play for 19 years and Heath 18, where Cahill scored 150 goals to Heaths 120. Fairly even when it comes down to it in terms of stats, although you could argue Cahill played in a poorer side against tougher opposition.
 
The guy harping on about teams from 35 years ago talking about rose-tinted glasses? Lol. Posters in here are celebrating Cahill because he was a great player that we bought for a song who never gave less than his all. Get out of this thread if that annoys you, you utter joy vacuum
Do one virgin - it’s the likes of you who have contributed to our demise. You’ll be championing Hibbert next !
 
Gotta' be a bit of a weirdo with zero perspective to talk nonsense about Tim and consider yourself a blue...end of story. If we'd had about 2 or 3 more of him we'd have been kicking around top 3 consistently just by pure force of will. He did a hell of a job for us and should never have to pay for a pint in a Liverpool bar if any Evertonians are wandering around.

And now for a bit of silliness...

 
Bizarrely both played 226 times for the blues. Heath scored 71 and Cahill 56. Cahill would play for 19 years and Heath 18, where Cahill scored 150 goals to Heaths 120. Fairly even when it comes down to it in terms of stats, although you could argue Cahill played in a poorer side against tougher opposition.

I think it's a tough argument. I mean Heath's game was about more than just goals and was a cleverer player than Cahill. Some of Cahills goals were also against lower league opposition so that has to be factored in.

In many ways Heath was ahead of his time really, and in an era now where 1 plays up top and a smaller lad can play as a 10 he'd have probably suited it to the ground. That being said Cahill would have fitted in very well into the 80's side in my view in terms of ethos and mindset. He was probably a player who in terms if mental strengths could have hacked it in the league at that stage.

It's always a difficult argument when you talk about older teams and who would get in them. I normally start from the premise that the 80's team in it's entirety would beat comfortably Everton sides that followed, but certain players may have lifted their game by being in that team. A while back I posed Joe Parkinson as a player who might have really suited that team. We love Bracewell but I might Parkinson (when at his best) as up there with him. Others probably disagree.

Where it comes to Cahill though, he'd have done very well in the mid 80's side and would have fitted it naturally. I think he'd have loved working under Kendall too with the passion he showed and responsibility he gave his players. My gut feeling is though he'd have been an impact sub, similar to an Alan Harper or Kevin Richardson who have been a really useful player but probably not a regular starter. A great man to have as 12th/13th man though.

There's no disgrace in that either. He'd have probably been in that bracket for most of the best post war Everton teams. I remember Steve Waugh said of Darren Gough, that he'd have none of the English cricket team in his Aussie team, then paused and said he'd actually have had Gough for the dressing room and that he never gave up. I see Cahill as similar to that. In terms of ability a little bit off most of the great players, but mentality wise top class.
 
...I liked him lots, tremendous attitude, delivered when his team needed and he scared the opposition.

I remember reading Alex Fergusons book and he pinpoints Jamie Carragher as the sort of character you want. There's a moment on the touchline where he is coming on and Ferguson shouts over to him "you better (expletive) not kick any of my players" and Carragher snapped back "I'm going to kick every ****ing one of them". Ferguson held him in high esteem.

I take what Carragher says about our players seriously. I agree with him when he said for too long too many were too soft and pally. However he picks out Tim Cahill as a great player who was a nightmare to play against and Everton's best in the time he played. That always said a lot to me about the sort character Cahill had. The only other one he mentioned was Ferguson at around the mid to late 90's when he was an absolute colossus (particularly in Derby Games). So it's high praise for Cahill.
 
I remember reading Alex Fergusons book and he pinpoints Jamie Carragher as the sort of character you want. There's a moment on the touchline where he is coming on and Ferguson shouts over to him "you better (expletive) not kick any of my players" and Carragher snapped back "I'm going to kick every ****ing one of them". Ferguson held him in high esteem.

I
take what Carragher says about our players seriously. I agree with him when he said for too long too many were too soft and pally. However he picks out Tim Cahill as a great player who was a nightmare to play against and Everton's best in the time he played. That always said a lot to me about the sort character Cahill had. The only other one he mentioned was Ferguson at around the mid to late 90's when he was an absolute colossus (particularly in Derby Games). So it's high praise for Cahill.

Love that
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar Threads

Welcome

Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.

🛒 Visit Shop

Support Grand Old Team by checking out our latest Everton gear!
Back
Top