the bus seating area was marked as being for “colored people”, Tubey
edit: an example
View attachment 133270
Oh good, just thought you'd had a mad lapse then lol lol lol
the bus seating area was marked as being for “colored people”, Tubey
edit: an example
View attachment 133270
With a nice message like "Equality would be nice" written on it and a picture of two differemt coloured rabbits on it
Agree 100%. I never levelled any criticsism at all.Same as the famous Scopes Trial regarding creationism/evolution - meticulously planned in advance.
Thing is mate, it doesn't matter. Indeed, the fact it was well thought out, addressed a very obvious injustice, was well carried out and succeeded means it deserves applause. Planning is no reason for criticism.
Can be anything really. Just so long as highlighting racial inequality and violence is done in a way that doesn’t offend white people.With a nice message like "Equality would be nice" written on it and a picture of two differemt coloured rabbits on it
Like how to correctly use the ‘enter’ key to start a new paragraph?Agree 100%. I never levelled any criticsism at all.
More a statement of fact that a few on here have
no idea about. Although they do know about everything
else![]()
Can be anything really. Just so long as highlighting racial inequality and violence is done in a way that doesn’t offend white people.
We need to make him more centristThat black rabbit looks a bit Marxist.
With a nice message like "Equality would be nice" written on it and a picture of two differemt coloured rabbits on it
"Bunnies' lives matter"Would some people associate the rabbits with its ears to pornography??
I'm pretty sure we can get the likes of Farage and his ilk to say this is gesture politice and a link to playboy.
There is a significant difference in the Prime Minister stating that he is “not supporting booing” and him coming out and condemning it. He said today that people who racially abuse footballers will be banned from grounds. Now that could be construed as a gesture as racial abuse is an offence and should be prosecuted.Did he?
What did he say?
I heard him say they never supported booing the England team and are committed to practical measures to combat racism.
Where was the lie? Admittedly I tuned in a bit late.
And my word, I do not misunderstand the importance of gestures - that's my entire point; how important it is when gestures don't work is as important as when they
There is a significant difference in the Prime Minister stating that he is “not supporting booing” and him coming out and condemning it. He said today that people who racially abuse footballers will be banned from grounds. Now that could be construed as a gesture as racial abuse is an offence and should be prosecuted.
Lol at this dweeb being big dweeb. Imagine aligning yourself with this bunch of dweebs.

Booing isn't speech though is it? At best it's ill-mannered and at worst it sends players the message that the fans don't respect them enough to allow them to engage in a brief moment of anti-racist solidarity.Should it hell.
He's not supporting booing; he's simply not condemning it, as it's freedom of speech. It isn't racial abuse, that's just bloody daft.
Booing isn't speech though is it? At best it's ill-mannered and at worst it sends players the message that the fans don't respect them enough to allow them to engage in a brief moment of anti-racist solidarity.
Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.