Current Affairs The Conservative Party

[dead_soft]

Wow in 90 mins they found 15% of riders on bikes stopped had no insurance or were committing offences.

Thats a huge %.

Don't need insurance. 15% is probably pretty low if you're actively stopping people rather than a random check. The 'offences' are created by a crap working environment. Go for the business not the workers.

Finally, you're an idiot so that was a waste of time

 

[mill]

If that was the case, they wouldn't be taking immigration along with them. Thinly veiled hostile environment is still a hostile environment. People are being a pain in the arse. Oh, those people have dark skin, lets take immigration along as well and kill two birds with one stone.

What’s incredible is how important those workers have been this last year.

Theyve been vital and now they aren’t needed they are being treated like this.

And yet people will hide behind ‘the law’. As if the law is never wrong. As if the law is never abused.

 

[Lapeno77]

 

[Jebus_lives]

Better rail services promised in huge shake-up

Transport Secretary says there is no "hidden agenda" to raise fares but there could be no guarantees.

www.bbc.co.uk

Marxism!!! Taking us back to the 1970's!!

 

[DanEFC92]

 

[Tubey]

Genuinely disgusting. Sadism is the perfect word for it. There's something wrong with her.

 

[Tubey]

Better rail services promised in huge shake-up

Transport Secretary says there is no "hidden agenda" to raise fares but there could be no guarantees.

www.bbc.co.uk

Marxism!!! Taking us back to the 1970's!!

Most people agreed with nationalising the railways. It wasn't contentious.

What people disagreed with in relation to Corbyn was 'nationalise everything'.

 

[Bruce Wayne]

She really is horrendous.

 

[Bruce Wayne]

Better rail services promised in huge shake-up

Transport Secretary says there is no "hidden agenda" to raise fares but there could be no guarantees.

www.bbc.co.uk

Marxism!!! Taking us back to the 1970's!!

They're going to have union jacks all over the trains, aren't they?

 

[JimmyJeffers]

Most people agreed with nationalising the railways. It wasn't contentious.

What people disagreed with in relation to Corbyn was 'nationalise everything'.

Think a lot of people are in favour of some form of public ownership in many sectors but it was the wrong argument to pitch at that time. Many people didn’t want to hear an argument for nationalising railways whilst Brexit was raging on. Was woefully misguided.

 

[Jebus_lives]

Most people agreed with nationalising the railways. It wasn't contentious.

What people disagreed with in relation to Corbyn was 'nationalise everything'.

I know. And you've argued on here in the past that you choose what things you nationalise, prove the concept, then add to that.

But I can't help but imagine what some would be saying we're it the other way around.

 

[Jebus_lives]

They're going to have union jacks all over the trains, aren't they?

Rhetoric about the 'envy of the world' and another opportunity to draw on nostalgia about Empire, the role the railways had in building it and increasing social mobility of the UK population.

 

[tsubaki]

Think a lot of people are in favour of some form of public ownership in many sectors but it was the wrong argument to pitch at that time. Many people didn’t want to hear an argument for nationalising railways whilst Brexit was raging on. Was woefully misguided.

TBF that sort of thing should always be pitched; it is after all a symptom of the same malaise that has led to Brexit.

The baffling thing is why all major parties were in favour of the old franchise system.

 

[Jebus_lives]

She really is horrendous.

Did she really think she needed a name badge that said 'home secretary'?

 

[The Gueye Science]

Did she really think she needed a name badge that said 'home secretary'?

It's to keep the Home Office goons from accidentally deporting her as well.